[UNKNOWN]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
[UNKNOWN]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
[UNKNOWN]: This is Turley Talks.
[UNKNOWN]: The entire Trump administration's priority is to actually get the Save America Act passed.
[UNKNOWN]: We have the proudest and in some ways the oldest democracy anywhere in the world.
[UNKNOWN]: 250 years we just celebrated and yet if you vote in California you're lucky if a month after the election day your vote has actually been counted.
[UNKNOWN]: We know that we have in certain jurisdictions, illegal aliens who are casting ballots.
[UNKNOWN]: We know that 80 plus percent of the American people.
[UNKNOWN]: want you to show a voter ID in order to vote and yet there are a lot of big blue states that make that impossible will in fact criminalize the act of asking for an ID in order to vote.
[UNKNOWN]: Why would you criminalize asking for an ID in order to vote unless you wanted to encourage and promote cheating?
[UNKNOWN]: So this is an important priority for the administration.
[UNKNOWN]: More importantly, it's an important priority for the American people to save our elections.
[UNKNOWN]: The way you save America is by bringing election integrity
[UNKNOWN]: It's something that matters.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a shame that the Democrats aren't going to help us get this done, given that a majority of Democrat voters actually want us to have election integrity in this country, but we've got a good piece of legislation to support the troops, support the farmers, and get save America act past.
[UNKNOWN]: This of course is the first step, but it's an important step.
[UNKNOWN]: We're going to take it together.
[UNKNOWN]: We're going to be successful, and we're going to keep on working out of them there.
[UNKNOWN]: I just came from a very productive meeting with Senate Republicans and the conversation is shifted in a very favorable direction.
[UNKNOWN]: We're talking now much more about how best to do this, not whether to stay in work on the Save America Act, but what procedural vehicle to use in order to get this thing done.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, he did it somehow some way.
[UNKNOWN]: President Trump just got these feckless senators to finally start talking about how they're going to get this done and pass the save act once and for all.
[UNKNOWN]: We're going to get a front row seat on the full court press that President Trump just ran on his own Senate majority leader.
[UNKNOWN]: We're going to see the nearly 20 Republican senators who are an open revolt against Thun forcing his
[UNKNOWN]: We've got a Democrat Senator finally prepared to defect and vote for the save act.
[UNKNOWN]: And we've got a brand new executive order out of the oval office that promises to change our nation like never before.
[UNKNOWN]: everyone, it is a live stream Friday.
[UNKNOWN]: I am your host, Dr. Steve, your patron professor here to help you make sense of the madness with breaking news and analysis.
[UNKNOWN]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
[UNKNOWN]: So you know what to do, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe.
[UNKNOWN]: But as always, our super chats are up.
[UNKNOWN]: So feel free to send in your comments, your questions.
[UNKNOWN]: Whatever you like throughout the broadcasts and to be my privilege, my honor to answer them right here on this live stream.
[UNKNOWN]: Also, many of you, I know love two things.
[UNKNOWN]: You love books and you love money.
[UNKNOWN]: Right?
[UNKNOWN]: Who does that?
[UNKNOWN]: Right?
[UNKNOWN]: Well, if you love books and you seriously looked into making money from home, and I mean actually look not just
[UNKNOWN]: There are people I kid you not pulling in five, 10, 15,000 dollars a month out of a 30 billion dollar market you've walked past your entire life without a second thought.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm talking about the used books market and the only reason that they can make that kind of money is because of a pricing gap sitting right there in the middle of the market, real
[UNKNOWN]: documented.
[UNKNOWN]: Nobody's looking at it.
[UNKNOWN]: It's insane.
[UNKNOWN]: It's literally hidden.
[UNKNOWN]: Here's the gap.
[UNKNOWN]: The same book, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So the same title, same edition, same condition is worth meaningfully different amounts depending on where it's listed.
[UNKNOWN]: That's it.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the whole thing.
[UNKNOWN]: And people with no finance background, no tech background, they've learned to spot it, act on it from a laptop at the kitchen table, and then they're making thousands of dollars a month.
[UNKNOWN]: Now here's the part that got me.
[UNKNOWN]: You never have to handle a single book.
[UNKNOWN]: Not one.
[UNKNOWN]: There's no inventory in your garage.
[UNKNOWN]: No packing tape.
[UNKNOWN]: No trips to the post office.
[UNKNOWN]: No physical logistics whatsoever.
[UNKNOWN]: The whole thing runs in your browser.
[UNKNOWN]: You find the opportunity.
[UNKNOWN]: You make a few clicks.
[UNKNOWN]: And then somebody else handles the fulfillment completely.
[UNKNOWN]: And as you heard, this isn't a side hustle to pad the grocery budget.
[UNKNOWN]: People are running this full time right now.
[UNKNOWN]: And number them to walk away from jobs.
[UNKNOWN]: They never liked in the first place.
[UNKNOWN]: So I've loved this.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm hosting a free training where my special guest is going to lay out the entire.
[UNKNOWN]: system for from beginning to end.
[UNKNOWN]: How you find it, how the gaps are formed in the like exactly what you do, the moment you've got a gap in front of you, these price gaps, start to finish.
[UNKNOWN]: No theory, no filler.
[UNKNOWN]: Absolutely free.
[UNKNOWN]: Go to bk profit.com slash early right now.
[UNKNOWN]: If you love books and you love money, I'm telling you, click the link below.
[UNKNOWN]: type it in your browser, scan the QR code, whatever you got to do, reserve your free seat right now.
[UNKNOWN]: You're going to absolutely love this.
[UNKNOWN]: Alright, let's dive right in here gang.
[UNKNOWN]: As you know, the Save America Act.
[UNKNOWN]: is an expanded voter integrity bill, okay?
[UNKNOWN]: Demands, it's to me.
[UNKNOWN]: I can't even believe I have to actually spell out why each of these very simple straight forward demands are important.
[UNKNOWN]: Every single person needs to provide proof of citizenship to register to vote.
[UNKNOWN]: Every single person needs to show photo ID in order to actually vote, doesn't matter where you are, it's universal, whether you're in Texas or California, and there is a mandate to yearly scrub non-citizens off the voter rules.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, obviously there'll be a big mass of purge, but then there's got to be follow-ups as well.
[UNKNOWN]: simply put the save act universalizes the election integrity protocols that are properly basic to any functioning vibrant democracy.
[UNKNOWN]: In this case, in our case, a constitutional republic.
[UNKNOWN]: These requirements are the very requirements that the vast majority of democracies all over the world have instituted for years now.
[UNKNOWN]: And as such, it's no surprise that proof of citizenship and voter ID requirements consistently poll as the single most popular political issues out there.
[UNKNOWN]: Don't take my word for it.
[UNKNOWN]: Here's CNN admitting it to their own rapidly dwindling audience.
[UNKNOWN]: voters favoring photo ID to vote among all voters are talking 77% and this is uniform, basically, or universal, I should say, universal, Democrat 62% independent 77%, Republicans 95% this is something that is popular across the political spectrum is a rare thing that is popular across the political spectrum.
[UNKNOWN]: When it comes to voter ID, the voters are with
[UNKNOWN]: Overall, very clear we're talking about three and four overall who support the idea of photo ID in order to this is why this white Trump is finding so hard for it.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean three and four voters how many political issues do you know of that garner that kind of supermajority support?
[UNKNOWN]: I mean seriously
[UNKNOWN]: So naturally that means that the Democrats, as usual, are united in their opposition against.
[UNKNOWN]: And remember what Russia used to say, whatever is good for America's bad for the Democrats.
[UNKNOWN]: whatever's good for Democrats is bad for America.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, that's just that's universal.
[UNKNOWN]: What Americans overwhelmingly support the Democrats will always unanimously oppose.
[UNKNOWN]: It's literally a law of the universe.
[UNKNOWN]: And unfortunately, as part of that law, there will
[UNKNOWN]: always, always, always be a handful of repulsive establishment, a rhino republicans to join them.
[UNKNOWN]: I always prefer Diablo, or I Democrat and all but label, but note, note gang, it's never.
[UNKNOWN]: It is never the other way around.
[UNKNOWN]: It's never a handful, four or five Democrats joining Republicans in one of their legislative priorities.
[UNKNOWN]: It's always turn coat Republicans betraying their base on behalf of their establishment donors who hate Trump and hate the mega movement and who themselves cannot win without their foreign own form
[UNKNOWN]: of fraud, like Lisa Murkowski's reelection consistently depends on the other sham of ranked choice voting, right, ranked choice voting crowns a winner who is not the top choice of most voters.
[UNKNOWN]: And they do that by discarding ballots for eliminated candidates through multiple rounds.
[UNKNOWN]: Effectively manufacturing a fake majority rather than reflecting genuine first choice preferences.
[UNKNOWN]: So as we speak,
[UNKNOWN]: four-effectless rhino republicans have joined forces repeatedly with the Democrats to defeat the Save America Act, Markowski, Mitch McConnell, our own moachedaba, our own cardboard cutout senator, Tom Tillis and North Carolina who will fortunately be leaving us after this session and Maine Susan Collins, who's up for reelection this November.
[UNKNOWN]: John Thunes answered to Trump, to Mike Lee, to the base, was always the same, tired, demoralized line.
[UNKNOWN]: We don't have the votes.
[UNKNOWN]: We don't show me the 60 votes.
[UNKNOWN]: If you can find me the votes, I can get it passed.
[UNKNOWN]: Maybe President Trump would like to come to Capitol Hill and find me the votes.
[UNKNOWN]: If ever there was a funeral director, Senator, it is John Thune.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, the guy literally looks like,
[UNKNOWN]: a mortuary got what it's so patty pathetic it's so ridiculously demoralizing to the bay soon is the senate leader he's the leader of senate republicans that's let's literally his title it is his job to garner the votes necessary for the passage of the legislative
[UNKNOWN]: So if Thun can't lead his own brigade, his own senators, then he needs to step aside for someone who can.
[UNKNOWN]: And so in the face of that incessant wimpiness, Trump did what Trump always does.
[UNKNOWN]: He escalated and he escalated hard.
[UNKNOWN]: So late last month, Trump posted directly at Thun on true social do not let the Senate leave town until it passes the Save America Act or far better still until it terminates the filibuster.
[UNKNOWN]: Now that's not a suggestion.
[UNKNOWN]: That's a president publicly ordering his own majority leader around in front of the entire country, basically telling him to grow a spine and become the leader that he's supposed to be.
[UNKNOWN]: Remember, the Republican party is not actually, let me frame it this way, that's better to frame it this way.
[UNKNOWN]: Trump and Thune.
[UNKNOWN]: are coming from very different political persuasions, okay?
[UNKNOWN]: Soon, is old school Republican, which means he's in Establishmentarian.
[UNKNOWN]: He's in Establishmentarian.
[UNKNOWN]: He sees politics as fundamentally deliberative.
[UNKNOWN]: Politics is deliberation.
[UNKNOWN]: So he's part of our own version of the House of Lords.
[UNKNOWN]: This is the place of second thought.
[UNKNOWN]: They often refer to the cooling saucer.
[UNKNOWN]: that the founding fathers built into slow down the passions of the house, right?
[UNKNOWN]: We're compromise and procedure matter far more than speed, and where you don't torch two centuries of Senate tradition on a whim.
[UNKNOWN]: problem here for Thune is that the Democrats have effectively blown up that system, that's sanitorial system.
[UNKNOWN]: They have no intention of compromising on any issue, maggot supports at all ever.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, they're not even supporting an issue that literally garners 80% support, majority supported their own voters.
[UNKNOWN]: They have weaponized the filibuster, the same way Nancy Pelosi weaponized impeachment.
[UNKNOWN]: So they have completely blown apart that establishment, terrient, senatorial, deliberative precedent.
[UNKNOWN]: Wow, see that five times fast.
[UNKNOWN]: At least when it comes to the bills that matter most from magas.
[UNKNOWN]: So Thun is living in an old politics.
[UNKNOWN]: He's living in a world that's simply no longer exists.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's where Trump's politics come in and the politics of the new Magga Republican Party.
[UNKNOWN]: Trump understands that in the age of total war politics, deliberation without leverage isn't statesmanship.
[UNKNOWN]: It's surrender dressed up like in a powdered way, right?
[UNKNOWN]: You don't win the knife fight by quoting Robert's rules of order.
[UNKNOWN]: Trump's whole theory of the presidency and of the executive branches that if the other side has already burned the rulebook, the only honorable move left is to burn it right back faster and make them own the wreckage.
[UNKNOWN]: Thune wants to preserve an institution, the Democrats have already gutted from the inside, while Trump wants to win the actual fight that's happening on the ground right now, two day with real consequences for the country.
[UNKNOWN]: And that more than any personality clash is the entire war being fought inside the Republican party this week.
[UNKNOWN]: It's the old establishmentarian elite versus the new Republican party of fight, fight, fight, win, win, win.
[UNKNOWN]: So in that spirit, Trump sent his secret weapon.
[UNKNOWN]: And that, of course, is the one and only vice president, JD Vance.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, remember, JD was a senator right before he was VP.
[UNKNOWN]: So he knows these guys.
[UNKNOWN]: He knows how things work in the Senate.
[UNKNOWN]: And he didn't sit back and let this die in a press release war.
[UNKNOWN]: Vance has been physically walking the halls of the Capitol meeting with senators, working to save act angle from the inside.
[UNKNOWN]: This isn't new for him.
[UNKNOWN]: He's been embedded in this fight since, well, Maya, at least July working with Speaker Mike Johnson at the House side and pushing the procedural angles with Thune directly on the Senate side.
[UNKNOWN]: At the very same time, there's a growing revolt against Thune among his own senators.
[UNKNOWN]: Nearly 20 Republican senators have either called for canceling recess out right or express support for staying in Washington until the bill gets a vote.
[UNKNOWN]: It all started with the great Mike Lee, the center from Utah who we heard from earlier.
[UNKNOWN]: He's the first one that came out and objected to the Senate going into recess in August.
[UNKNOWN]: At least,
[UNKNOWN]: at least until such time as a Senate has passed the Save America Act or has a plan to pass the Save America.
[UNKNOWN]: He'll be fine with that.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what we just heard the other day.
[UNKNOWN]: And then he got joined by one Republicans Center after another after another to the point now where there are upwards of 20 GOP senators.
[UNKNOWN]: calling for the Senate to remain in session until they pass the save act again or at the very least layout exactly how it will be passed in time for the midterms.
[UNKNOWN]: No vote, no vacation is basically their motto at this point.
[UNKNOWN]: No vote, no vacation unless they show us how they're going to get it done and then get it done as soon as they come back.
[UNKNOWN]: And now,
[UNKNOWN]: we're getting word that the Democrat wall itself is beginning to crack.
[UNKNOWN]: We've got the first Democrat senator routinely coming out and openly saying he's going to support at least some form of the say back.
[UNKNOWN]: And that, of course, is the one and only
[UNKNOWN]: Pennsylvania Center, John Federman now.
[UNKNOWN]: Many don't know that Federman has actually been breaking from his own party on voter ID for over a year now.
[UNKNOWN]: So back in February, you went on Fox and said requiring basic ID to vote is not unreasonable.
[UNKNOWN]: He rejected the whole insane ridiculous Jim Crow 2.0 nonsense as fellow Democrats are pushing.
[UNKNOWN]: Except, of course,
[UNKNOWN]: Did you hear about the, I forget the quick digression here, but Marxist Mam Donnie was asked, how on earth is he going to ensure that only New York City residents shop at his new government and run grocery stores that discount all items by 30%, right?
[UNKNOWN]: If New York taxpayers are flipping the bill, they're the ones providing the subsidies that allow the grocery stores to reduce their prices by 30%,
[UNKNOWN]: what's to stop people from coming from, you know, Jersey or Connecticut or Pennsylvania and stock up on all these discounted items, right?
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's, this is great.
[UNKNOWN]: Who needs Costco when you got Man Donnie stop and shop, right?
[UNKNOWN]: And did you hear about that?
[UNKNOWN]: His answer was well, we'll require shoppers to show an ID.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, I mean, Joe Rogan was, I forget who he was talking about that with the other pages.
[UNKNOWN]: Like, you know, you just, I mean, you just gave up the ghost, man, you literally just blew it with that one statement.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, you can't, I mean, think about what he just openly admitted.
[UNKNOWN]: He was asked basically the question, how do you protect against, in this case, shopping fraud and what was his solution?
[UNKNOWN]: ID verification.
[UNKNOWN]: ID verification is, Mam Donnie's recognized chief means by which to protect against fraud.
[UNKNOWN]: You can't make this.
[UNKNOWN]: Shasta up.
[UNKNOWN]: You can't.
[UNKNOWN]: see everyone's in a while when they're just, you know, talking and just reality just bites the Democrats.
[UNKNOWN]: There's just no way around it.
[UNKNOWN]: It's like it's like watching these, what is it like Uber commercials saying, you can now you can now request a female driver.
[UNKNOWN]: What's a woman?
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, Uber.
[UNKNOWN]: Can you tell us what a female is?
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's just insane.
[UNKNOWN]: It's again, it's, it's, oh, who was a Cory Bush who just lost her primary.
[UNKNOWN]: Isn't she the one who's screened and yelled in a recent house hearing that Republicans were against women's rights and then one of the Republicans said, oh, Ms. Bush, can you just please define what do you mean by woman?
[UNKNOWN]: What is a woman?
[UNKNOWN]: See, everyone's in a while just when they let their guard down, reality creeps in for a Democrat.
[UNKNOWN]: Reality gets the best of them.
[UNKNOWN]: And then they end up contradicting them.
[UNKNOWN]: So, and, of course, they end up having to ask Mamdoni as they have to backtrack on this because it was so patently embarrassing.
[UNKNOWN]: It was so obviously hypocritical because, of course, Mamdoni opposes voter ID.
[UNKNOWN]: Alright, I digress.
[UNKNOWN]: So Fetterman has come out in support of a stripped-down version of the Save America Act, one that focuses solely and precisely in voter ID.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, this may actually work to our advantage, which I'll show you in a second.
[UNKNOWN]: So if the Save Act were passed in chunks, in portions, each
[UNKNOWN]: each provision attached to different reconciliation bills that only require 50 votes for passage, thus bypassing the Senate's weaponized filibuster.
[UNKNOWN]: Then ironically, we wouldn't need another republic in devote for it.
[UNKNOWN]: in terms of the ID requirement, we just need Fettermen, right?
[UNKNOWN]: We've got 53 GOP senators for our opposing it.
[UNKNOWN]: So if we get rid of one, replace it with Fettermen, that's 50, and then JD's the tying vote.
[UNKNOWN]: So all of this came together this week, and here's Mike Lee's latest update.
[UNKNOWN]: Here's the complete one.
[UNKNOWN]: and just came from a very productive meeting with Senate Republicans.
[UNKNOWN]: And the conversation is shifted in a very favorable direction.
[UNKNOWN]: We're talking now much more about how best to do this, not whether to stay at work on the Save America Act, but what procedural vehicle to you in order to get this thing done.
[UNKNOWN]: So, look, I always, this is a step-by-step process.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't want to proclaim victory,
[UNKNOWN]: I want to thank Senate Majority Leader, John Thune, and our whip, John Baraso for leading very productive discussion today.
[UNKNOWN]: So that's Mike Lee, after he just came out of a closed door, Senate Republican meeting.
[UNKNOWN]: And, you know, as you can see, he sounded more hopeful than he has in months.
[UNKNOWN]: Keep in mind, up until this point, it's always been we're trying to get the votes for trying to get the votes.
[UNKNOWN]: Here's one way we can bypass.
[UNKNOWN]: Here's another way, but nobody's listening.
[UNKNOWN]: No one's doing it.
[UNKNOWN]: So now his exact framing is that the debate is now about precisely which procedural vehicle they can actually use to get this done.
[UNKNOWN]: So what I'm hearing there is that this is about in effect shopping up the save act into multiple parts and then attaching each portion to its own reconciliation bill that would only need 50 votes.
[UNKNOWN]: So as to appease someone like Fetterman in one vote and then appease someone like Susan Collins in another vote.
[UNKNOWN]: So instead of trying to pass it all at once.
[UNKNOWN]: which apparently they just can't do, you pass it in portions.
[UNKNOWN]: So the vehicle, everyone's now circling is the latest house past $95 billion budget resolution.
[UNKNOWN]: It's really neat.
[UNKNOWN]: The house has passed the save act multiple times, and each time they've pinned it to a different reconciliation bill.
[UNKNOWN]: So what the Senate can do,
[UNKNOWN]: is they can chop up their own version of the save act, put it in portions acceptable to each hold out in the different votes and then pass the whole thing as the result of the end of the entire process.
[UNKNOWN]: So this is what it means by this being sort of a step-by-step process.
[UNKNOWN]: I think in many ways it's brilliant.
[UNKNOWN]: So among the few holdouts here, each is willing to vote for a particular portion of the save act,
[UNKNOWN]: And each seems to be attracted to a different portion.
[UNKNOWN]: So Fetterman wants voter ID, Susan Collins is concerned more about proof of citizenship, to register, uh, Fetterman doesn't want the proof of citizenship.
[UNKNOWN]: Susan Collins may not want the voter ID, whatever.
[UNKNOWN]: So all you do is you just separate those items, put them on two different reconciliation bills, and boom, you pass both.
[UNKNOWN]: And you have the basic outline of the save act that eventually forms the whole.
[UNKNOWN]: Can I just, you see, this is what Throne is supposed to be doing.
[UNKNOWN]: As the Senate leader, this is why is he making Mike Lee do that?
[UNKNOWN]: Wow, I mean, so in fairness, and this is what I'm a bit hopeful.
[UNKNOWN]: Mike Lee did thank John Throne in that video.
[UNKNOWN]: Mike Lee has been a real thorn in his side.
[UNKNOWN]: And so that was very reconciling in the sense that was he just came out and said, I want to thank John Thune.
[UNKNOWN]: So obviously in that closed or meeting John Thunes like, yeah, I think we can do this.
[UNKNOWN]: He was part of this process of success.
[UNKNOWN]: One way of thinking about is, it looks like the save act now is on two tracks or multiple tracks, but with the same destination in the end.
[UNKNOWN]: So that's where we are right now with the save act.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, as Mike Lee said, baby steps, but we're getting there, and there's no question that it was Trump's full court press this week that got us to this point.
[UNKNOWN]: But President Trump wasn't done.
[UNKNOWN]: The most mind blowing move came just yesterday.
[UNKNOWN]: He just pulled off something even more longer lasting that will affect our nation's ways.
[UNKNOWN]: We can't even imagine for the foreseeable future and not for me this.
[UNKNOWN]: is what I'm really impressed with.
[UNKNOWN]: This is going to absolutely blow you away.
[UNKNOWN]: But first, if you're just joining us, our super chats are up.
[UNKNOWN]: So feel free to send in your comments or questions.
[UNKNOWN]: I'll get to as many as I can before we wrap up.
[UNKNOWN]: And as always, you know, as socialists like Mamdoni blatantly defy basic economics and just basic reality.
[UNKNOWN]: I think it's more important than ever for Patriots across the country to tap into proven systems that actually build wealth for us and our families, rather rely on its redistribution.
[UNKNOWN]: Right.
[UNKNOWN]: So for example, you want to take a guess as to where the big banks quietly put their money when the markets get shaky.
[UNKNOWN]: Not in stocks, not in bonds, not even in crypto.
[UNKNOWN]: Every single year, institutions like Wells Fargo and Chase were talking the biggest banks in the world.
[UNKNOWN]: They quietly buy up roughly 90% of something, most America's actually have never even heard of.
[UNKNOWN]: They're called tax leans, created by government statute, secured by real American property.
[UNKNOWN]: And here's the part that got my attention when I came across this.
[UNKNOWN]: The returns aren't set by Wall Street.
[UNKNOWN]: The returns aren't even set by the Fed.
[UNKNOWN]: The returns are actually set by law.
[UNKNOWN]: They're about as guaranteed as you can possibly get.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, the big banks will love to keep this well secret to themselves, but here's what they can't hide.
[UNKNOWN]: This isn't just for institutions.
[UNKNOWN]: It's for everyone.
[UNKNOWN]: Everyone can do this.
[UNKNOWN]: Every day Americans can do the exact same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: And you can get started with this little $50.
[UNKNOWN]: literally a 50 bucks.
[UNKNOWN]: Now a friend of mine named Jay has been doing this for years, very successful at it.
[UNKNOWN]: And he's teaching regular hardworking folks how to do it too.
[UNKNOWN]: So on Wednesday, August 12th at 8 p.m. Eastern 5 p.m. Pacific.
[UNKNOWN]: Jay is hosting a free live master class and he's going to buy a real tax lien live right there on the video call start to finish nothing hidden to show you exactly how you can do the very same thing it's a quiet steady law-based strategy that lets hardworking patrons build real wealth on their own terms without
[UNKNOWN]: begging the Fed without gambling on the volatility of the markets and without handing your future to the same institutions.
[UNKNOWN]: I got us into this mess in the first place.
[UNKNOWN]: No market timing, no complicated strategies, no tenants, no rehabs, no leverage, just a couple of spare hours a week.
[UNKNOWN]: That's it.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, this masterclass happens only once, live,
[UNKNOWN]: In real time, there's no replay of that live purchase demonstration when it's done.
[UNKNOWN]: It's done.
[UNKNOWN]: So do not be the last one to find out about this.
[UNKNOWN]: Go to turlyclass.com to lock in your spot.
[UNKNOWN]: That's turlyclass.com or just text turly to 72,000 that's 720 or even easier.
[UNKNOWN]: Scan the QR code on your screen, tap send.
[UNKNOWN]: And you're in again, it's Wednesday, August 12, 8 p.m. Eastern.
[UNKNOWN]: I'll see you at that master class.
[UNKNOWN]: We've got a lot of things going on here in the Turley Talksville, lots of wonderful stuff and opportunities for you to financially flourish.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what we want.
[UNKNOWN]: We want Patriots across the country financially flourishing and setting the stage for a new conservative renewal.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, let's zoom out because this week wasn't just about the Senate floor.
[UNKNOWN]: Yesterday, President Trump signed a pair of executive orders that tell you exactly how far this administration is willing to go on citizenship and voting integrity, even without Congress.
[UNKNOWN]: The first bands what's called birth tourism, I'm sure you've heard of this,
[UNKNOWN]: birth tourism, if you don't know, is the practice of foreign nationals traveling to the United States specifically to give birth here, so their child automatically gains citizenship under our ridiculously and absurdly interpreted birthright citizenship laws, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So the Supreme Court completely dropped the ball on this no question, but this EO now is trying to sort of side
[UNKNOWN]: or even not even bypass, but simply
[UNKNOWN]: simply reimagine how we get the very same thing in different ways.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a very similar like of ending birthright citizenship.
[UNKNOWN]: How what are the ways we could chip away at that?
[UNKNOWN]: That's perfectly constitutional.
[UNKNOWN]: This E.O.
[UNKNOWN]: now officially and completely bands birth tourism.
[UNKNOWN]: It doesn't get into the mechanism per se.
[UNKNOWN]: Which should be as simple as, I mean, just simply banning anyone pregnant
[UNKNOWN]: The one key measure that the EO listed out is that they would be denying visas to suspected applicants and organizers of what are called birth tourism rings.
[UNKNOWN]: So it is, unfortunately, a form of human trafficking.
[UNKNOWN]: Birthright citizenship is very lucrative for nefarious groups outside or even probably inside the United States.
[UNKNOWN]: And when one so-called reporter,
[UNKNOWN]: in the Obo office during the press conference of the signing of this EO.
[UNKNOWN]: When that's so cold, report a question to the legality of this band, Steven Miller took her to civic school.
[UNKNOWN]: Because if you want to do your research on this, Section 215A of the Immigration and Nationality Act gives the president this authority.
[UNKNOWN]: 215A of the Immigration and Nationality Act very, really used, probably one of the strongest laws in the entire federal code, gives him this power.
[UNKNOWN]: That's not the only, but it's the main statutory authority that's being used in this order.
[UNKNOWN]: So birth tourism is by definition of fraud on the American system, on the American taxpayer,
[UNKNOWN]: If you're coming here, and again, your state of purpose is that you're a tourist, then by definition, you are here to come for a few weeks.
[UNKNOWN]: Look what we have, engage in commerce and leave.
[UNKNOWN]: So if you're telling a concert officer, you're here as a tourist.
[UNKNOWN]: But your true purpose and intent is to go to a baby male, give birth, and try to mint an American citizen while you're here, then you're committing a fraud against the American government.
[UNKNOWN]: And by definition, that visa can and should and will be now denied.
[UNKNOWN]: Brilliant.
[UNKNOWN]: So there you have it in the past foreigners pretended that they were coming yet for Disney land or some national park, but the real reason they came of course was to manufacture US citizen child, who they hope eventually gets access to welfare benefits and down the line of the voting booth.
[UNKNOWN]: As of Thursday of this week, just yesterday that practice is now officially banned.
[UNKNOWN]: The second executive order was very interesting.
[UNKNOWN]: It expands who's exempted from birthright citizenship claims.
[UNKNOWN]: So it's specifically targeting alien enemies of the United States.
[UNKNOWN]: This is brilliant, right?
[UNKNOWN]: Who the heck?
[UNKNOWN]: is going to say that alien enemies should be allowed, the children of alien enemies should be allowed to be U.S. citizens, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So it's targets, alien enemies at targets, members of foreign terrorist organizations and it targets people acting as unregistered agents or lobbyists,
[UNKNOWN]: for foreign governments.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, this is brilliant, you know, chipping away strategy.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a direct response to ensuring that large numbers of people who would otherwise wrongly claim on a madx.
[UNKNOWN]: Citizenship no longer qualify for that.
[UNKNOWN]: Now Trump himself acknowledged this is the first step in his administration in making adjustments after the Supreme Court struck down as a original 2025 birthright citizenship.
[UNKNOWN]: I think he signed that little on the first day of his administration, January 20th.
[UNKNOWN]: But they struck down that original E.O.
[UNKNOWN]: that targeted children of illegal migrants
[UNKNOWN]: Again, what I so appreciate about what Trump is doing here Trump is demonstrating that there's more than one way to skin a cat right one of my
[UNKNOWN]: One of my favorite euphemisms, by the way, I think it comes from the late like 17th century England.
[UNKNOWN]: It's, if you look at its origin, it's pretty Macau.
[UNKNOWN]: But regardless, he's finding creative solutions to get done.
[UNKNOWN]: What he knows needs to get done and he's finding those creative solutions, given the limitations that are put in front of him.
[UNKNOWN]: That's exactly what he's calling on John Thune to do.
[UNKNOWN]: He doesn't get up before well.
[UNKNOWN]: I tried to end birthright citizenship, but the Supreme Court struck it down.
[UNKNOWN]: So if you want to get me a new Supreme Court, I'll be happy to pass it, but there's I can't do anything.
[UNKNOWN]: There's this this defeatist mentality has no place in a mega Republican party.
[UNKNOWN]: And here's this is precisely where these two events loop together.
[UNKNOWN]: whether or not the Save America Act ultimately clears the Senate this month.
[UNKNOWN]: This White House has made it unmistakably clear that citizenship integrity is not a talking point for them.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a governing priority they will pursue through Congress if they can.
[UNKNOWN]: and through executive authority, if they can't, if they have to go that route.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the through line connecting Thunes pressure campaign.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the through line connecting the recess revolt among the 20 GOP senators or Federmins Crack in the wall, Mike Lee's reconciliation path.
[UNKNOWN]: Now these executive orders.
[UNKNOWN]: Every lane is being pushed at once.
[UNKNOWN]: make no mistake.
[UNKNOWN]: These eos are part of the pressure campaign where Trump is sitting there in a victory lab.
[UNKNOWN]: Look at what I just signed.
[UNKNOWN]: Look at that.
[UNKNOWN]: Let me take questions.
[UNKNOWN]: Who wants to, hey, Steve, tell them how I have the constitutional authority for the film that needs to be you.
[UNKNOWN]: You need to be doing that with the say that.
[UNKNOWN]: And then keep in mind the ultimate option here.
[UNKNOWN]: If the Save Act does ultimately fail, Trump still has the nuclear option.
[UNKNOWN]: There are growing calls for President Trump given the nefarious activity of hostile states interfering in our elections as he showed a couple of weeks ago.
[UNKNOWN]: They're calling on President Trump to declare a national emergency to save our elections.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, the latest to advocate for that is Garland Favareto, he's the co-founder of Trusted Election Results in the state of Georgia, he's on the front lines of election integrity.
[UNKNOWN]: And he just released an urgent public statement this week calling on President Trump to do just that, to declare a national emergency, to restore election integrity in the event, but the Senate fails
[UNKNOWN]: to pass the save act.
[UNKNOWN]: So we've talked about this before and some of our earlier videos.
[UNKNOWN]: So if you've been with us for some time, you'll know about this.
[UNKNOWN]: If not, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
[UNKNOWN]: But a national emergency declaration is very specific to executive power.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's because it bypasses the entire slow motion Senate gridlock, and at the same time it bypasses any activist judge trying to stop it.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what makes nationally emergency declarations different than EOs, executive orders, which judges activist judges could,
[UNKNOWN]: Well, they've been limited now, but they can, they can at least slow down, right?
[UNKNOWN]: Nationally emergency declarations are beyond the Supreme Court has made this decision already.
[UNKNOWN]: They are beyond the purview of the courts.
[UNKNOWN]: The courts cannot decide what is a, is not a national election, national emergency.
[UNKNOWN]: The only ones who can stop that is the legislative branch.
[UNKNOWN]: The only ones who can reverse a national emergency is the Senate and that's by a two-thirds vote.
[UNKNOWN]: So good luck with that.
[UNKNOWN]: So if the president has the legal authority in the political will,
[UNKNOWN]: to use national emergency powers to force election security forms into place, that changes his entire calculus.
[UNKNOWN]: So here's where we actually stand as of today.
[UNKNOWN]: As we speak, the Save America Act has not yet passed.
[UNKNOWN]: It's not yet on President Trump's desk, but the assumption that nothing would ever move
[UNKNOWN]: The Democrats would never crack that Republicans would never revolt against their own leadership.
[UNKNOWN]: That soon would never budge on his establishmentarianism.
[UNKNOWN]: That is some to all those assumptions are now dead.
[UNKNOWN]: Fetterman cracked, right?
[UNKNOWN]: The, well, he've cracked the Democrat wall technically speaking.
[UNKNOWN]: nearly 20 cent Republicans are now willing to blow up their own August plans over this, likely the guy leading the entire fight since January is using the word favorable and very optimistic for the first time in months.
[UNKNOWN]: That's not nothing in this town.
[UNKNOWN]: That's a huge breakthrough.
[UNKNOWN]: President Trump is going to get this done one way or another.
[UNKNOWN]: And it is now our job to do our part as the mega revolution and contacting our senators and demanding the very basic election integrity so integral to our national flourishing.
[UNKNOWN]: We changed the world before our gang.
[UNKNOWN]: It's time to do it again.
[UNKNOWN]: Over to you, over to you, over to you.
[UNKNOWN]: I want to hear what you guys have to say.
[UNKNOWN]: Our super chats are still up.
[UNKNOWN]: So fire away with any questions or comments.
[UNKNOWN]: You have it.
[UNKNOWN]: It'll be happy to answer them right here on this live stream.
[UNKNOWN]: Also, did you know that US life expectancy actually peaked?
[UNKNOWN]: at 78 years back in 2014, and global life expectancy is declining for the very first time in 30 years.
[UNKNOWN]: It's because people are aging faster than ever before.
[UNKNOWN]: And this is largely due to more toxins in the air and chemicals in our soil and our food and other external factors that are new to us.
[UNKNOWN]: Now what most people don't know is that we can actually fight aging on a cellular level.
[UNKNOWN]: Scientists have discovered that kimchi
[UNKNOWN]: actually slows the aging process of human cells helping to protect them and delay aging.
[UNKNOWN]: The power of nature can outweigh the power of pharmaceuticals without the nasty side effects.
[UNKNOWN]: And now you get all the benefits of kimchi in a simple capsule with kimchi one.
[UNKNOWN]: I take kimchi one every single day.
[UNKNOWN]: I absolutely love it.
[UNKNOWN]: Every capsule delivers over 900
[UNKNOWN]: probiotic strains plus antioxidants and enzymes that support your digestion, your metabolism and your skin health from the inside out.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, as we age, we become more susceptible to microbial threats, harmful viruses, and bacteria.
[UNKNOWN]: But the beauty is that kimchi one is actually a natural anti-microbial.
[UNKNOWN]: helping your body fight off harmful bacteria viruses and even toxins while boosting immunity and energy.
[UNKNOWN]: Investible, kimchi wants 100% made in America, toll on natural, and non-GMOs.
[UNKNOWN]: So do what I do.
[UNKNOWN]: Support your gut, protect yourselves and feel younger every day with kimchi one from Brightcore.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, today you can get an exclusive offer just by clicking the link below.
[UNKNOWN]: Use Code Curly for 25% off your entire order or for an even better deal.
[UNKNOWN]: 50% off your order and free shipping give them a call right now a triple eight five nine seven zero two three three.
[UNKNOWN]: That's eight eight eight five nine seven zero two three three.
[UNKNOWN]: All right.
[UNKNOWN]: Joshua.
[UNKNOWN]: What do we got?
[UNKNOWN]: Willow tool.
[UNKNOWN]: Good AM to all Dr. Steve.
[UNKNOWN]: Is it true that Komi or warrant for his arrest has taken place in North Carolina.
[UNKNOWN]: I saw that too and lost it laugh out loud moment for me your thoughts on, but I did I if you haven't seen it there's these memes now a Trump like I mean you're just acting like a total badass and he's just got this full head of hair already just it's just hilarious.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean it's just you know silly I mean that's basically what it is it's silly
[UNKNOWN]: I have not heard about Komi yet, I mean, I can look it up on my my slow computer as it's sleeping here, but we can go back to it and see I'll look it up, but I have not seen any arrest yet North Carolina this would be if is what is 86 47.
[UNKNOWN]: C-shell that he just happened to find.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, isn't this interesting and then posted for everyone to see?
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I'm sure that's going to come.
[UNKNOWN]: It's just a matter of time, especially with the assassinated failed.
[UNKNOWN]: Thank God assassination attempts.
[UNKNOWN]: In human condition, Democrats voted for every far left nominee and created a Frankenstein that will destroy them.
[UNKNOWN]: Read couple is five laws of human stupidity.
[UNKNOWN]: If they're elected to the Senate, nothing will stop them, never underestimate stupidity.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, in human condition, you're absolutely right.
[UNKNOWN]: They have only themselves to blame in all of this.
[UNKNOWN]: What basic, as I understand it, what basically happens is that the rank and file of the Democrat party got taken over more and more, they're technically known as third worldists.
[UNKNOWN]: Okay, we've talked about this.
[UNKNOWN]: Third worldists are those who see the world, their Marxists who see the world in a civilizational binary.
[UNKNOWN]: So the first world, the West, is the epitome of evil.
[UNKNOWN]: We are the ultimate oppressor.
[UNKNOWN]: And the third world, the global south, are those rising up rightly so morally so against that oppression.
[UNKNOWN]: And so that's how you have a man, Donnie.
[UNKNOWN]: who can cast landlords in New York as occupiers and oppressors and the police department as like Israeli defense literally occupying a city and then the tenants as the victims, the tenants, as those who are trying to rise up and get a better life for themselves, but they've been basically put in this oppressive prison.
[UNKNOWN]: That's third world as I mean, and then Islam gets thrown in there because Islam is the principle religion of the third world and therefore seen as a mark of sanctity for this struggle.
[UNKNOWN]: And I mean, we saw it with Ilhan Omar, we saw it with Rashida to leave.
[UNKNOWN]: uh... we saw it uh... with with uh... obviously ma'am donny now we're seeing it with else side and michigan uh... it's happening ever were just seeing sorted this third world is take over the democrat party and the only way dem because democrats are losing so many voters the only way they felt they're party had any future was you know to make make peace with this uh... with this growing movement but the irony is what was his name shree
[UNKNOWN]: that as the Indian fellow who just got voted out is in the Wisconsin or Michigan, I forget where he is.
[UNKNOWN]: But who imputes files articles and impeachment against Trump like literally every week, barely speaking.
[UNKNOWN]: He just lost his primary to one of these DSAs candidates.
[UNKNOWN]: So they're going to get rid of all of them.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the irony.
[UNKNOWN]: They're
[UNKNOWN]: And the good news is, I think James Garvel's right.
[UNKNOWN]: I do think Bill Morris, correct.
[UNKNOWN]: It's going to be very hard for them to win nationally.
[UNKNOWN]: Because their toxic third worldism is popular only among populations that are either majority foreign born, and then became citizens later like in New York,
[UNKNOWN]: Chicago or Seattle or something like that or just a very, very high density of them.
[UNKNOWN]: Or just, you know, just municipal far left districts cities counties to begin with outside of that, they're they're they're considered odious by even, again, even by Democrats.
[UNKNOWN]: Let me see, I just took a look at this.
[UNKNOWN]: I am not seeing anything on Komi and North Carolina, unfortunately.
[UNKNOWN]: So we'll have to, we'll have to,
[UNKNOWN]: follow up on that.
[UNKNOWN]: But I'm just on X putting it in.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, well, so I'm seeing one there that on August second and a rest warrant has been filed for James Komi.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if it is corroborated though.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'd have to take a look at it.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, yo is corroborated things on X.
[UNKNOWN]: That's important.
[UNKNOWN]: I love X.
[UNKNOWN]: Don't get me wrong.
[UNKNOWN]: But people could put up anything on X.
[UNKNOWN]: So
[UNKNOWN]: rubber guys ironic the left says they don't want his real dictating stuff yet they always screen Palestine is hit that place rules over us as well feels like the whole region is calling the shots over us.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I mean again, this is this is this is the reverse.
[UNKNOWN]: Exactly.
[UNKNOWN]: This is the reverse Israeliism that you're seeing among some of the woke right.
[UNKNOWN]: Is there they're allowing Iran and Palestine to dictate their political persuasion towards Trump.
[UNKNOWN]: to this third world, it's this universal binary that says that the West is inherently evil and the third world rising up against it is the moral good that it's the oppressed versus the oppressor and and so exactly it just they the collect what it's so interesting that you're bringing out here.
[UNKNOWN]: is the inconsistency of replacing one metinarrative with another one.
[UNKNOWN]: So they're replacing a metinarrative of whiteness and Eurocentrism and patriarchy of which they see Israel as a proxy.
[UNKNOWN]: They see Israel,
[UNKNOWN]: as a Western, you know, as a representative, a micro representative of Western imperialism being imposed in the Middle East.
[UNKNOWN]: So they take that meta narrative and they deconstruct it and they show all the bits and parts of how it's evil and
[UNKNOWN]: and how oppressive it is and like.
[UNKNOWN]: And then what do they do?
[UNKNOWN]: They turn around and they replace it and they embrace another meta narrative that somehow some way ends up escaping any criticism whatsoever.
[UNKNOWN]: Does it matter, fact?
[UNKNOWN]: Again, you guys remember back in 2020, 2020, what the height of cancer coach?
[UNKNOWN]: We weren't allowed to criticize vulnerable communities.
[UNKNOWN]: We weren't allowed to create, they were, they were beyond reproach.
[UNKNOWN]: So there's one meninarrative where they apply critical thought and then they replace it with another meninarrative where they make illegal critical thought against it.
[UNKNOWN]: You're not a, it's so sacred, you're not even allowed to begin to question it.
[UNKNOWN]: And unfortunately, I think we see that on, on the, some former Congresswoman's,
[UNKNOWN]: Twitter feed and a former very popular Fox news host where you're literally seeing Hassan Piker, like talking points, third world is talking points, but just coming more from the right.
[UNKNOWN]: But it's the same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: It's an uncritical adoption of a meta narrative that justifies itself because of a radically critical destruction of another meta narrative.
[UNKNOWN]: And so it's by definition,
[UNKNOWN]: Democrats, socialists, help back the SAO, great and layer it, page professor, to question about Pennsylvania, one of the historic rate we've been going, when do you think Pennsylvania will officially turn red?
[UNKNOWN]: And to how do you think Josh Shapiro feels about handling, handing Pennsylvania over to the Republicans on his watch?
[UNKNOWN]: I've read a couple of, I'll go in reverse or I've read a couple of different analyses of Shapiro.
[UNKNOWN]: and I don't know which one is right.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't.
[UNKNOWN]: I just don't have the inside baseball knowledge.
[UNKNOWN]: And of course, one is, one is, they both can be right.
[UNKNOWN]: Could be quite frankly.
[UNKNOWN]: But one is, you know, he is an aspirational Democrat.
[UNKNOWN]: He's as crooked as they come.
[UNKNOWN]: He's like Kamala 2.0, but he's actually smart and intelligent.
[UNKNOWN]: But he's just, he's just, he's a fraud.
[UNKNOWN]: He hasn't done half the things he claims.
[UNKNOWN]: He's done blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[UNKNOWN]: That's probably nearly true.
[UNKNOWN]: There is another view, though, that says, you know,
[UNKNOWN]: In the third world of Democrat party, they are not going to elect a Jew.
[UNKNOWN]: There's just no way around.
[UNKNOWN]: It's not going to happen.
[UNKNOWN]: He's a person on grata.
[UNKNOWN]: And so in many respects, as a centrist Democrat, like Fetterman, many respects, he's actually, he has no problem handing over
[UNKNOWN]: Pennsylvania to the Republicans, if this is what the Democrat party is becoming.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, these guys, their loyalty isn't necessarily to a party.
[UNKNOWN]: Their loyalty is to power.
[UNKNOWN]: And if they see the power evaporating or going in the hands of those that they see as a genuine threat to their own, the physical livelihood, they'll go the other way.
[UNKNOWN]: Just it's just human nature.
[UNKNOWN]: They're not
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, and when is it going to flip?
[UNKNOWN]: Sorry, so sorry, Pennsylvania.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, look, it could flip tomorrow.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, what I mean by that is what we saw was the just past week or last weekend, we saw a voter roll purge that got rid of hundreds of thousands of predominantly filly and active voters.
[UNKNOWN]: And that gave us a net 30,000 and put us within 50,000 now.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, no, we're within 25,000 now of active voters, of officially flipping Pennsylvania right again.
[UNKNOWN]: And saying because it was nearly a million Democrat voter registration advantage just 10 years ago.
[UNKNOWN]: So
[UNKNOWN]: It could literally happen overnight.
[UNKNOWN]: If we have another purge like that, where we net the 30,000, we got it by 5,000.
[UNKNOWN]: Pennsylvania is the new North Carolina, right?
[UNKNOWN]: North Carolina, it took a while to flip, but it finally flipped, and it's not looking back like Florida.
[UNKNOWN]: Like Ohio, it's not looking back.
[UNKNOWN]: Iowa, same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: And so I think we're gonna,
[UNKNOWN]: See that?
[UNKNOWN]: Well, I wouldn't be surprised if we see it in the next year.
[UNKNOWN]: I wouldn't be surprised.
[UNKNOWN]: Before the midterm probably not, but I wouldn't be surprised if this time next year, next August, we're talking about a solid, you know, pretty solid red Pennsylvania.
[UNKNOWN]: And the trends aren't going to turn.
[UNKNOWN]: They're just not going to get it.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, there's
[UNKNOWN]: There are these gimmicky turns where Democrats get these massive influx of voter registered, but that's only for, that's generally only for primaries, Democrat primaries.
[UNKNOWN]: Once the primaries are over, they all disappear, because they cheat even in their own primaries.
[UNKNOWN]: But regardless, that's why I think probably within the year.
[UNKNOWN]: Richard, Dr. Steve, in your opinion, is maga splintering or considered podcast was serving up clickbait?
[UNKNOWN]: At the latter, I don't see any evidence at all.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, again, there are some pollsters, they're a bit marginal who are arguing.
[UNKNOWN]: There is significant polling evidence that maga has splintered, maga is basically dead.
[UNKNOWN]: But in terms of the, in terms of the pollsters
[UNKNOWN]: 2024, you know, insider advantage, quannus insights, their
[UNKNOWN]: They're not showing anything of the like and even ones that are repeatedly left-wing, because remember, studies show that national polling consistently veers four points to the left of what actually occurs with elections.
[UNKNOWN]: They're not showing anything remotely like that.
[UNKNOWN]: They might show low approval numbers of Trump.
[UNKNOWN]: They always do that, that's nothing new.
[UNKNOWN]: Uh, whenever even Harry Antony's pointed out whenever asked, do you support, are you maggot, do you identify maggot with maggot, do you support Trump, do you support the war?
[UNKNOWN]: Do you sort of stuff?
[UNKNOWN]: It's always very, very high, but I'm more talking hi 80s, 90s.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm not seeing that Bobby Kennedy is still fully on board, Tulsi Gabbard is now dealing with some issues with her husband.
[UNKNOWN]: She's fully on board.
[UNKNOWN]: The coalition is there.
[UNKNOWN]: It's strung his cabinet as strong, uh, no one's, uh,
[UNKNOWN]: it is there's no actual objective evidence that I can see the voting registration trends continue to work in the favor of the GOP, Democrats are desperate to just get a few extra seats in the house.
[UNKNOWN]: They're barely holding on and Michigan and New Hampshire.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm seeing a very strong GOP.
[UNKNOWN]: In the broader electorate, can Trump have Iran and the midterms?
[UNKNOWN]: Can he both have this ongoing conflict Iran and win the midterm?
[UNKNOWN]: We have to see.
[UNKNOWN]: Right now, he seems to think we can.
[UNKNOWN]: We have to see.
[UNKNOWN]: But right now, I don't see the coalition cracking.
[UNKNOWN]: No, the podcasters, they're just, I mean, they're just, I don't know how to say this.
[UNKNOWN]: We in the podcast world, we in the online influencer world, as we're called, you know, we do, we don't like admitting it, but we do live a very sheltered life.
[UNKNOWN]: We do.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm putting myself fully immersed in that.
[UNKNOWN]: I'll even call myself the most sheltered wall, because as you guys know, I don't, I don't go out much.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't
[UNKNOWN]: I don't collab much, and if I do go out, it's usually a brawn, and it's for building Christendom.
[UNKNOWN]: It's establishing Christian schools around the world and these sort of things.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm not a big, I don't go to conferences, I don't go to big, big of a TPUSA, I just don't, it's just not my thing.
[UNKNOWN]: see myself as probably the most, you know, secluded person of all sheltered of all.
[UNKNOWN]: But I have an analysis that recognizes that and tries to break through that.
[UNKNOWN]: So what one of the ways I learned to do that was through my doctorate.
[UNKNOWN]: My doctorate is an early Christianity first
[UNKNOWN]: and I don't have access to that world.
[UNKNOWN]: I can't study that world as it exists because we're 2000 years later.
[UNKNOWN]: So I've developed tools that could help me reach back 2000 years into that world and try to understand it on its own terms.
[UNKNOWN]: It's why you always use the term descriptive rather than prescriptive.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm trying to understand it on its own in terms of trying to describe what's going on.
[UNKNOWN]: And then we can have a wonderful conversation.
[UNKNOWN]: Is it right?
[UNKNOWN]: Is it wrong?
[UNKNOWN]: What, you know, blah, blah, blah, whatever.
[UNKNOWN]: How does it relate to this house?
[UNKNOWN]: Those tools that I developed.
[UNKNOWN]: It's technically known as the historical critical method.
[UNKNOWN]: Those tools have helped me kind of get outside of my own little sheltered bubble.
[UNKNOWN]: and understand what's actually happening in a wide swath of data and information and source, what's actually happening in the world right now?
[UNKNOWN]: And that's why I've made it, that's why I wrote the book, Civ Cause, I'm just, you know, give that kind of frame to help us understand big picture what's happening in the realm,
[UNKNOWN]: of the magamovement and geopolitics that's rapidly turning into the opolitics because of the demographic revolution of religious conservatives, grabbing kids and secularists or not, Benny Johnson was just talking about that the other day.
[UNKNOWN]: The rise of techno politics,
[UNKNOWN]: right?
[UNKNOWN]: What's known is the newest fear and how religion and science, tradition, technology are actually coming together as the double helix of civilizationalism and how that moves out into astropolitics.
[UNKNOWN]: We're now we're literally starting to think, how do we rule the galaxy?
[UNKNOWN]: quite literally.
[UNKNOWN]: There are star wars like laws right now governing things like satellites and satellite distribution and elimination and cleanup and lunar bases and space travel on the like.
[UNKNOWN]: So I try to get out of my sheltered existence on a daily basis and really understand
[UNKNOWN]: Thank you, Durham University, for that enabled me to understand what was happening 2,000 years ago.
[UNKNOWN]: So it's kind of the same thing, but I just got to say I just think most influencers are very, very sheltered and they're creating.
[UNKNOWN]: We also look one last thing and I'll just move on.
[UNKNOWN]: We also have something called virtualism that we have to be careful of.
[UNKNOWN]: And I think influencers fall into this a lot.
[UNKNOWN]: And again, I'm just being generic.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm not, I don't mean
[UNKNOWN]: But virtualism is literally the creation of virtual reality.
[UNKNOWN]: So because we spend so much time on screen, scholars have talked about this.
[UNKNOWN]: We spend so much time on screens.
[UNKNOWN]: We can begin to blur.
[UNKNOWN]: The difference and oftentimes there's a very real difference where we've all heard that that X is not reality right we could blur the difference between internet and reality we can blur the difference of a cyber world and the real world now obviously want and that's where my tools come in we want them to overlap.
[UNKNOWN]: Right, because the cybersphere is its own integral world, but it should overlap with the physical sphere, otherwise we become nostics modern day nostics and nostics always claimed to have secret knowledge that they alone had access to and that you needed to follow them in order to have access to that knowledge.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if that sounds familiar sounds somebody who's just sitting in there.
[UNKNOWN]: studio with their laptop claiming to have secret knowledge about what really happened and you have to
[UNKNOWN]: follow that person.
[UNKNOWN]: If you want to have that secret knowledge, you know, just that's an ostracism.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's very common with what's proton or neo-nostacism with with this latest virtualism that unfortunately I do think takes up a lot of influencer content.
[UNKNOWN]: So there you go.
[UNKNOWN]: Brian, my good friend in recent video mentioned 80% of Republicans are opposed to socialism.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, dude.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, I could just see us in the old ego campus just talking to who the hell, no, I'm going to say I'm going to write it for you.
[UNKNOWN]: Who the hell are the other 20% out?
[UNKNOWN]: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
[UNKNOWN]: negotiations for decades.
[UNKNOWN]: What confidence can we have?
[UNKNOWN]: But this will end well.
[UNKNOWN]: Great question.
[UNKNOWN]: All right.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, leave it up there, so I could just remember.
[UNKNOWN]: Remember, these these polls, I mean, there are studies that show that pollsters routinely on average ski about four points.
[UNKNOWN]: on their poles then what is actually happens in an election.
[UNKNOWN]: And I just have to seem like you that that that pole skewed 20 points left for heaven's sex or 10 points left or whatever.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, Tucker is trying to come up with a full-blown sort of
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know, I guess an Eastern European version of right wing culture and left wing economics.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean Trump does this.
[UNKNOWN]: He pivots to the right on culture.
[UNKNOWN]: Pivots to the left on economics to bring in the working class.
[UNKNOWN]: So he's very pro-protectionist and an interventionist and things like they certainly not a libertarian, for example.
[UNKNOWN]: But Tucker seems to want to go full, like, you know, Hassan Piker and, and, and, and, uh, Abdul Sayed, uh, and, and Mamdaani when it comes to his economics.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, I'm just as just when I'm getting from comments from other people.
[UNKNOWN]: And that, uh, so, but I don't see him representing 20% of the Republican party.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm with you a thousand percent.
[UNKNOWN]: Even again, when you've been
[UNKNOWN]: just the amount of Democrats that support socialism at like 52 53% that's still 40% very strong who are thoroughly capitalist and and so yeah and what all Hollywood stars say oh I'm socialist yeah right you ain't socialist when you're negotiating your contract for the latest Marvel movie I can assure you that.
[UNKNOWN]: So, I'm with you.
[UNKNOWN]: I just have to, I just have to, I have to report what's there, right?
[UNKNOWN]: Now, in terms of what's going on in Iran, the latest isn't, you know, I follow a lot of VDH.
[UNKNOWN]: Victor Davis-Hanson.
[UNKNOWN]: The end is in Eberboa.
[UNKNOWN]: The latest is by all indicators, subjective indicators.
[UNKNOWN]: Iran's economy does look like it's about to falter.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's what apparently that is what they've been waiting for.
[UNKNOWN]: So remember the reality was already dropping into the, I mean, it was a nose dive before the February 28th bomb bombing started.
[UNKNOWN]: It was already falling apart.
[UNKNOWN]: It was already out of control inflation.
[UNKNOWN]: It made the Argentinian peso look, you know,
[UNKNOWN]: happened with our counter blockade, $500 million equivalent of revenue starved in the day.
[UNKNOWN]: And it was just, it was just a matter of time before the economy just breaks and the cash, the reality just becomes absolutely worthless.
[UNKNOWN]: And they're arguing, they're right at the cost and they've been waiting for that.
[UNKNOWN]: Once the reality is worthless, they can't do anything with proxies because they can't give him money anymore.
[UNKNOWN]: And they believed that their loyalty to the regime would collapse because it was a bought and paid for patronage system.
[UNKNOWN]: The vast majority of the loyalty to the regime is paid for loyalty.
[UNKNOWN]: And so the moment they can't pay you anymore, the loyalty disappears and the regime topples.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what they're waiting for.
[UNKNOWN]: So, I think that is eventually going to happen.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, it happened before November, and that's the thousand dollar question, right?
[UNKNOWN]: And that's what we'll have to say, right?
[UNKNOWN]: Trump still seems to think, and VDA chief, it seems to think that time is running out faster for the regime than it's running out for us.
[UNKNOWN]: He thinks based on the polling and these other indicators we're talking about, he thinks that we can actually Trump can have both Iran and the midterms.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, we a lot of us think that's very risky, you know, why risk it so much like our own form of DSA.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, dude, you have a free seat here.
[UNKNOWN]: Why are you risking it by putting else I had there.
[UNKNOWN]: Now it's a toss up.
[UNKNOWN]: It was a, you know, Michigan hasn't voted for a senator and since 1994, a Republican senator since 1994.
[UNKNOWN]: So dude, there's a guaranteed seat.
[UNKNOWN]: Why are you, why are you ruining it there?
[UNKNOWN]: Um, this is almost our version of that.
[UNKNOWN]: Look, I mean, we can actually, these guys are committing political suicide.
[UNKNOWN]: We can, we can actually gain seats in the house.
[UNKNOWN]: Why?
[UNKNOWN]: Why are we doing this now and jeopardizing it?
[UNKNOWN]: So I know it's a bit risky for a lot of us, but Trump seems to think you can do it VTH seems to think you can do it.
[UNKNOWN]: And so we'll have to see what happens.
[UNKNOWN]: But it seems that the ultimate goal
[UNKNOWN]: And if they economically collapse, they can't support proxies in a more, and they can't support supporters anymore within their own regime and then the regime topples.
[UNKNOWN]: And then, and then, or moves son or moves now, it's just a whole new ballgame, technically something worse can happen, but I don't see that at this point.
[UNKNOWN]: Terry, a part from the Save America Act will scot us rule on an application for stay of injunction to let the postal service refuse the mail balance in states that refuse to say who munger register voters is or is not a citizen of the United States.
[UNKNOWN]: Very good question.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm waiting on that.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if Scotis will give us a ruling before the election.
[UNKNOWN]: I do not know that.
[UNKNOWN]: Right now, as I speak, it's just going, it's bouncing back and forth in the appellate courts.
[UNKNOWN]: And at one point it was upheld and another point it's turned over and it's just going to kind of go back and forth.
[UNKNOWN]: One way or the other, I have a feeling Trump is going to make sure we crack down on blue states before the midterms.
[UNKNOWN]: Rubber guy, I think one reason people are turning communism is cost becoming too much, and AI isn't helping either.
[UNKNOWN]: They rather burn the system down, not knowing they were placed with something, where yeah, Rubber guy, it's really interesting you say that, because that was, who's assessment was.
[UNKNOWN]: I brought that up.
[UNKNOWN]: There was, I think it was a Democrats assessment.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, gosh.
[UNKNOWN]: I can't even remember who it was.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know why.
[UNKNOWN]: I think a pretty prominent one.
[UNKNOWN]: Is a mark helper mark helper and former Democrat.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, definitely.
[UNKNOWN]: We ship men and this was a both parties.
[UNKNOWN]: We ship manufacturing industry.
[UNKNOWN]: out of the country, and that created a vacuum for a lot of communities to feel like there's no upward mobility, there's no way of vehicle upward mobility, but even more than that.
[UNKNOWN]: What we're finding ironically is the working class is pretty pretty, uh, pretty turned off by these particularly Islamic socialists, so they really are supported primarily by the underclass of welfare class.
[UNKNOWN]: that vote Democrat, no matter what.
[UNKNOWN]: And the white professional class, and these are ones who are the ones who are getting replaced by AI.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the irony of it all.
[UNKNOWN]: And they're seeing themselves stuck with hundreds of thousands of dollars of student loan, and they can't pay it back because they can't get a job worth having because they have a worthless degree, a lot of them do.
[UNKNOWN]: And so they see Mamdoni and others as the wave of the future, and you said it perfectly.
[UNKNOWN]: They're not replacing it.
[UNKNOWN]: It's burning the system down, but the irony is, once you burn the system down, you can't
[UNKNOWN]: redistribute anymore and they're not building anything.
[UNKNOWN]: They're simp their parasites, all social systems do, ultimately is redistribute what producers create.
[UNKNOWN]: And so the more producers you punish, the less you're gonna have around and the more you're only gonna have ashes, nothing else.
[UNKNOWN]: Texas and Lashak, I was glad to see you post about sunny as I think the war on ownership has are Sony, because I think the one ownership has gone under the radar.
[UNKNOWN]: What can actually be done about it, though, and is the administrator aware of that?
[UNKNOWN]: Let me see, let me just check my notes for the week and double check that I'll take just a second.
[UNKNOWN]: You may have confused me with another very handsome influencer.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I don't have anything on Sony from the week.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm not quite sure Texas, let's see, a war on ownership has gone under the radar or an ownership on the radar.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I don't want to presume I know what you're asking.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm sorry, and you gave us a wonderful super chat.
[UNKNOWN]: Sorry, Texas, and look, maybe if you can follow up with that, what you meant, but I think you might be confusing this channel with another one.
[UNKNOWN]: It sounds like an interesting, very interesting topic for sure.
[UNKNOWN]: Super sticker from political viewer 9646.
[UNKNOWN]: Thank you, sir.
[UNKNOWN]: Love your thumbnail.
[UNKNOWN]: Mr. Spock not so sure we can make it 10 years or better to get it say back past in chunks.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, I know.
[UNKNOWN]: I know.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
[UNKNOWN]: You're I see what you mean.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
[UNKNOWN]: You're you're very frustrated with how.
[UNKNOWN]: the what's what's the what's the where paralysis is usually so the parliamentary paralysis you know this is by the way this is what Europeans are going through this is what what's freaking out sending Europeans so much is they're seeing their their establishment parties in their parliament
[UNKNOWN]: not being able to accomplish a damn thing, and that's what's giving rise to the right to it work.
[UNKNOWN]: So, no, I'm with you.
[UNKNOWN]: It's very, very frustrating.
[UNKNOWN]: Magga is an executive movement that moves very fast, because executive power, which Trump has really the first presence since FDR to reawaken federal power, executive power.
[UNKNOWN]: It was more or less a
[UNKNOWN]: You served by the administrative class of unelected bureaucrats and agencies.
[UNKNOWN]: So we've got we've taken that back and it's great, you know, but gosh, I mean, yeah.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, you've got the DSA saying they're going to abolish the Senate and I've made the comment there's no need the Senate's abolishing itself.
[UNKNOWN]: It's it's literally turning itself into a relic with with with no rationale to exist all this you know, well, it's the sorcerer that it's the cool sorcerer that cools down the the hot water house shut up, I mean it's just no it's dysfunctional don't try to hide your blatant dysfunctionality and corruption.
[UNKNOWN]: behind sanctified talk.
[UNKNOWN]: No question.
[UNKNOWN]: So I'm with you.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, it's frustrating.
[UNKNOWN]: Romination, if John Fetterman ran as independent for president, I think he would take the entire rust belt.
[UNKNOWN]: Democrats need to be careful.
[UNKNOWN]: You don't even know we can get on the ballot.
[UNKNOWN]: No, I'm with you.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, a Democrats do need to be careful.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't think he's going to I don't think he's going to be an independent.
[UNKNOWN]: Um, I, you know, Bobby Kennedy couldn't do.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, Ross Perl did a very, uh, should had a very good showing in 92 with 20%, but no one's even come close to matching that.
[UNKNOWN]: And again, that was the 92 laws of change since that make it even harder.
[UNKNOWN]: So good luck on getting on the bow, you know, so that's what I mean, he'll, he'll become a Republican, uh, especially as,
[UNKNOWN]: We see Pennsylvania flip red in the voter registration, and with the extraordinary, very positive, Pennsylvania Republican approval rating that he has.
[UNKNOWN]: Music and fiction, if save is not pass, I will, I am certain, we'll see Nashagar in the ice of the poles.
[UNKNOWN]: The red green alliance won't like it, but their opinion does not matter, a men, absolutely a men, they have no power.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, the way maimed Donnie, just absolutely embarrassed himself with it, we're going to arrest Netanyahu.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't care what you think of the guy.
[UNKNOWN]: Mandoni does not have that, a new city mayor doesn't have the power to arrest the Prime Minister of another country.
[UNKNOWN]: This is the virtualism, infecting Mandoni's sense of reality.
[UNKNOWN]: So these guys don't have power.
[UNKNOWN]: They've gotten that.
[UNKNOWN]: They've got power at least some power over the people living crazy Katie and Seattle or Brandon Johnson and Chicago, Mamdoni and New York.
[UNKNOWN]: They've got power over over the people who are stupid enough to be living there right now, but they don't have power.
[UNKNOWN]: over the federal government and on power over us.
[UNKNOWN]: And it's our job just to make sure they never even they never do.
[UNKNOWN]: And again, even if they did, it would be such an unbelievable disaster and it would be such an uprising.
[UNKNOWN]: You would see so many Democrats, moderate Democrats, again, like a centrist of Democrats, like Federman or a van Jones or who's really not happy about this stuff
[UNKNOWN]: Remember, don't forget, I mean, I mean, Elon Musk voted for Biden in 2020.
[UNKNOWN]: Elon Musk was a Democrat.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if he's a registered, but he voted Democrat and he admitted to that.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, you know, so just the transformation of this move and why, because of this woke nonsense, and that woke nonsense when it's married to the civilizationalism that I talk about in civicalism, civilizationalism, democracy, when you have wokeness, marrying civilizationalism, you get third worldism.
[UNKNOWN]: George Rivera-Junior, Fetterman is a fraud.
[UNKNOWN]: He talks huge, but votes with his buddies.
[UNKNOWN]: Think the Fauci vote, yeah, when the chips are down, he folds.
[UNKNOWN]: He will not cross over.
[UNKNOWN]: I hear you, I hear you, George, and what you're saying is not, is not untrue.
[UNKNOWN]: So, how do I put this?
[UNKNOWN]: He's a fraud because he has to be.
[UNKNOWN]: He's a fraud because he has to vote with his own coalition.
[UNKNOWN]: Once he flips to becoming a Republican, he would, if he were a Republican on that panel, he would vote it to get rid of Fauci.
[UNKNOWN]: He even said to Fauci, I'm embarrassed.
[UNKNOWN]: I regret that I actually trusted you.
[UNKNOWN]: So what we have to understand is that politics is about power.
[UNKNOWN]: And if you want to play the game of politics, you have to play on the team that you're on and play four of the team you're on.
[UNKNOWN]: So he's, but that said, that said he knows that he cannot win a Democrat primary for reelection.
[UNKNOWN]: He knows that.
[UNKNOWN]: Right, 80% of Democrats, 70%, 80% want him gone.
[UNKNOWN]: He has one of the lowest approval ratings of any Senator within his own party.
[UNKNOWN]: And so there's no way he's gonna win reelection.
[UNKNOWN]: So don't be surprised that after the Republicans hold the Senate in November that he makes a switch and gives us an extra seat.
[UNKNOWN]: Don't be surprised.
[UNKNOWN]: Um, so again, remember these guys don't, they don't necessarily ideology is not what animates them.
[UNKNOWN]: I know an animates Ron Paul, uh, or, uh, Tom Massey, but that's, that was their business model.
[UNKNOWN]: That's how they got their checks in the mail from libertarians across the country who, who believe that they were helping to grow the movement.
[UNKNOWN]: Um, you know,
[UNKNOWN]: practical guy who knows the rules of politics and he's found a niche for himself and his niche is to be the new Joe Mason where he can get on Fox and get very favorable coverage in conservative
[UNKNOWN]: circles.
[UNKNOWN]: And then use that as a leverage to more or less get what he wants from his Senate caucus.
[UNKNOWN]: And to the extent that he's getting what he wants from his Senate caucus in the Democrat, then he's good to vote with them.
[UNKNOWN]: He's going to play his part.
[UNKNOWN]: but he's going to break away from them enough so that they give him what he wants in order to bring him back and to get those votes like for Fauci.
[UNKNOWN]: But he can't survive.
[UNKNOWN]: He can't do that as Joe Manchin couldn't do that for long.
[UNKNOWN]: So either he's gonna have to give up.
[UNKNOWN]: He's not gonna go independent.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't see that.
[UNKNOWN]: So either he's gonna have to give up and just, you know, retire or he's gonna go Republican, that's the way of it.
[UNKNOWN]: Uh, taco woman.
[UNKNOWN]: Mike Lee for Senatorly.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I don't know if he can see the problems.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if he can win.
[UNKNOWN]: That's that's the problem.
[UNKNOWN]: That again, it's a dysfunctional institution.
[UNKNOWN]: But yes, Mike Lee's would be phenomenal.
[UNKNOWN]: Who knows after what happens after when we get three new mega senators from Texas and Ohio and Kentucky, he may win.
[UNKNOWN]: Rebel squirrel passing save in separate pieces has historical precedent the compromise of 1850 Steven A. Douglas broke it up into five bills and got each pass with shifting alliances within house and senate brilliant rebel squirrel.
[UNKNOWN]: I did not know that but that's exactly it that's exactly this is what Trump is saying to thune when he says end the filibuster.
[UNKNOWN]: You know pass it by recklessly do whatever you need to do what he's basically saying it's john figure it out dude.
[UNKNOWN]: figure it out.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't give a rip if you don't get rid of the fillet, but I don't care.
[UNKNOWN]: Just get it passed.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, the ends determine the means.
[UNKNOWN]: Just get a pass.
[UNKNOWN]: TMS solved, did they pass the save act?
[UNKNOWN]: Not yet.
[UNKNOWN]: Unfortunately, we are waiting on it.
[UNKNOWN]: Texas, and Lesha, I started to get these, the sense the tide was turning went through and lashed out at Caroline.
[UNKNOWN]: To me, it said it was getting to him, but also that he's afraid of Trump.
[UNKNOWN]: Otherwise, he would have gone after him instead of a surrogate.
[UNKNOWN]: Yes.
[UNKNOWN]: That's a very interesting and it's very good and that's usually what people do If they're trying to hit Trump and they know that's political poison within the Republican party Then they try to hit one of his surrogates.
[UNKNOWN]: You know again you see this among influence.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh Trump is great He's just being betrayed by the neocons that he led into his part well He then he's an idiot for letting these neocons in the party.
[UNKNOWN]: You're still hitting him.
[UNKNOWN]: You know that kind of
[UNKNOWN]: Um, but I think you're right.
[UNKNOWN]: No Trump was asked if he endorsed Thune for Senate leader again, or even for reelection and he refused to say yes or no.
[UNKNOWN]: So we'll have to say so again, that's his way of saying, John, you're on, you're on your on probation.
[UNKNOWN]: You're on probation.
[UNKNOWN]: And if you don't, if you don't deliver here, I'm going to come out swing it against you because he's in the solid red state and if Trump endorses a primary opponent, he'll get Liz Cheney to easily.
[UNKNOWN]: Lewis, grew as, grew as, what do you think, soon, is established from instead of a bush operative anti-Trump pro illegal alien invasion, Paul Ryan style Trump agenda saboteur?
[UNKNOWN]: But it needs to be a t-shirt.
[UNKNOWN]: Thought it needs to be a t-shirt.
[UNKNOWN]: What do you think saying is the establishment instead of?
[UNKNOWN]: No, that's what I mean by a establishment.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know if you're being cynical there.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what I mean by establishment.
[UNKNOWN]: The Bush operative anti-Trump pro-Elegal.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, the establishment is the globalist establishment.
[UNKNOWN]: The establishment wants open borders so it's to bring in cheap labor.
[UNKNOWN]: So it's to satisfy the CEO class that then serve as their principal donors to keep them advocating open borders.
[UNKNOWN]: They like to ship out manufacturing and industry so as to maximize the margins for their corporate donors and then leave our rust belts highly unemployed.
[UNKNOWN]: And then they like to denigrate our culture customs and traditions.
[UNKNOWN]: Because the moment we start noticing the demographic disruption and replacement, they push back by calling us racist bigots and white supremacists in the like.
[UNKNOWN]: So that's the establishment and not selling.
[UNKNOWN]: And Thune is part of that.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a soft version of it.
[UNKNOWN]: It's not the hardcore
[UNKNOWN]: You know, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi version, but I mean, he would he was voting to send our manufacturing overseas.
[UNKNOWN]: He was voting for for borderless globalist policies.
[UNKNOWN]: He was doing all kinds of things like that.
[UNKNOWN]: And he may not beat up our culture, but he let the Democrats do that.
[UNKNOWN]: And he certainly wasn't defending it wasn't.
[UNKNOWN]: Nancy Furkins, do you have a good source of definition to counter the lips and Katie Turr comments, misleading one-line definitions between Democrat socialism and communism and any otherisms they twist to convince liberals to hate maga.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I mean, so the media, so you wanna put this in perspective.
[UNKNOWN]: The media or what we call progressive realists.
[UNKNOWN]: Progressive realism is a belief system that more or less is rooted in the late 80s early 90s.
[UNKNOWN]: It actually ironically comes from Francis Fukuyama, who argued for the end of history on a geopolitical level where he said liberal international, the liberal international order is inevitable.
[UNKNOWN]: History is just moving in that direction.
[UNKNOWN]: So it's a kind of a hagellian Marxist, I won't get into that.
[UNKNOWN]: But bottom line, they believe that history naturally and inevitably bends towards a left-wing vision of social justice.
[UNKNOWN]: History always moves in that direction.
[UNKNOWN]: So 1994, Gingrich revolt, that was Peter Jennings to your memory called that Americans having a temper tantrum.
[UNKNOWN]: In other words, it's temporary, it's temporary,
[UNKNOWN]: The Bush president, he should never have won hanging chads and blah, blah, blah, Trump, oh, that Trump, that's just because Vladimir Putin interfered in the election.
[UNKNOWN]: Ha ha, right, talking about election integrity.
[UNKNOWN]: So life is always moving to the left.
[UNKNOWN]: There are periodic interruptions, but those interruptions are temporary.
[UNKNOWN]: Life is going to go back to left.
[UNKNOWN]: So, and this is the key, for the legacy media, you can never be too far left.
[UNKNOWN]: because if you're on the side of the left, you're on the side of history.
[UNKNOWN]: Democrats are always innocent until proven guilty.
[UNKNOWN]: Good luck trying to prove them guilty.
[UNKNOWN]: And Republicans are always guilty until proven innocent, good luck trying to do that.
[UNKNOWN]: That's their progressive realism.
[UNKNOWN]: So, you know, the answer to the DSAs what's the difference with socialism and communism.
[UNKNOWN]: Um, it's not hard in the end.
[UNKNOWN]: In the end, socialism has degrees, levels of degrees of collectivity, of collectivism and centralization.
[UNKNOWN]: So you've got a Denmark version and so forth.
[UNKNOWN]: Those are technically sort of social democracies.
[UNKNOWN]: They provide the welfare state and all that sort of stuff.
[UNKNOWN]: That's not what you have operative here.
[UNKNOWN]: They're not, I mean, that's how Bernie Sanders, and that's again how CNN are going to try to, they're going to try to pacify, oh, they wanted just free healthcare.
[UNKNOWN]: That's it.
[UNKNOWN]: They just want free healthcare.
[UNKNOWN]: They just want Medicare for all.
[UNKNOWN]: That's it.
[UNKNOWN]: They just want, they just want, they just want, they just want to take care of the people who are trying to come across the border, not criminalize.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's it.
[UNKNOWN]: That's it.
[UNKNOWN]: No, that's not it.
[UNKNOWN]: The key to communism is Marxism.
[UNKNOWN]: And Marxism is a dialectic materialism that says, dialectic means you've got two sort of opposing forces that kind of play off of each other.
[UNKNOWN]: There is an oppressor force, and there is an oppressed force.
[UNKNOWN]: That's, if you don't have those two forces, you don't have Marxism.
[UNKNOWN]: It's just that simple.
[UNKNOWN]: That's the dialectic we talk about.
[UNKNOWN]: you've got a an oppressor and you've got an oppressor.
[UNKNOWN]: You've got a victimizer and you've got a victim.
[UNKNOWN]: You've got an aggressor and you've got the agreed, okay?
[UNKNOWN]: What we saw in Marxism slash communism was a universal belief that economics always
[UNKNOWN]: has the economic history has formed ultimately two classes, a bourgeois class who own capital and a proletariat class who are slaves in effect to that
[UNKNOWN]: own to that bourgeois because the only way they can get money is by working for the bourgeois and doing stuff for the bourgeois and the bourgeois then hands them out peanuts for all this hard work and so the solution is to eliminate the bourgeois replace it with representatives
[UNKNOWN]: take the money that just somehow exists out there, that the bourgeois sort of captured like small with the dragon in the Hobbit, right?
[UNKNOWN]: But the gold just exists out there.
[UNKNOWN]: And what they're gonna do is they're gonna read this tribute all that money to the people.
[UNKNOWN]: But the key is you've got the only way it works is if you've got that binary, if you've got that dialectic between an oppressor and oppressed.
[UNKNOWN]: And tell me one sentence that comes out of the mouth of Mamdoni that doesn't appeal to that oppressor oppressed framework, we're going to tax the rich.
[UNKNOWN]: You don't hear that in Denmark.
[UNKNOWN]: You don't hear that in Sweden.
[UNKNOWN]: It is a bonafine kind of socialist centralized structure, but that sees everybody as a part of it.
[UNKNOWN]: We're all gonna go, so yes, there are producers there, but you know, but as producers, we're gonna make sure you have free healthcare and all that sort of say, it's a cooperative endow, let's say I like it, but it's more cooperative.
[UNKNOWN]: Whereas communism is a battle.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a fight.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a clash between an oppressor class and an oppressed class.
[UNKNOWN]: And what makes these new communist different is that rather than seeing it in terms of money, per se, though, man, Donnie's pushing that with affordability.
[UNKNOWN]: They're seeing it in terms of culture.
[UNKNOWN]: There is white supremacy in mind, Donnie plays off of this.
[UNKNOWN]: There's white supremacy, and there's everybody else.
[UNKNOWN]: There's patriarchy, and there's everybody else.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, cisgender superiority and there's everybody else and on and on and on there's western civilization and there's everybody else there's the racism of western civilization and everybody else of course never have anything to do with racism whatsoever that's the that's the frame that then justifies some very very horrible things carried out.
[UNKNOWN]: in the name of justice.
[UNKNOWN]: So that's how you can push it away.
[UNKNOWN]: Bottom line communism is a binary.
[UNKNOWN]: It's a dialectic between a presser and a presser.
[UNKNOWN]: That's communism.
[UNKNOWN]: Sorry, that's not socialism.
[UNKNOWN]: Socialism is just a, an economic system or network or structure.
[UNKNOWN]: Communism is an ideology.
[UNKNOWN]: And that concept, that's why, in the end, we call them DSAs, but they're communists.
[UNKNOWN]: They are full blown communists who see Western civilization as the oppressor that needs to be destroyed from within.
[UNKNOWN]: That's not socialism, that's communism, that's Marxism.
[UNKNOWN]: And then if you do not join that morally righteous crusade, then you're part of the problem and you need to go down with the system as well.
[UNKNOWN]: So there you go.
[UNKNOWN]: Christie, why isn't Trump called for Thunes resignation?
[UNKNOWN]: Do you think Mike Lee will replace him?
[UNKNOWN]: Also Trump adores Andy Ogo?
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, he lost his primary European.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, he did he did in in Tennessee, um, look, no, uh, right soon.
[UNKNOWN]: The last thing you want Thunes to do is resign.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm sorry.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, I know I see a lot of, you know, there needs to resign.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, what, what do you who get to replace him with?
[UNKNOWN]: Who's going to get all those votes?
[UNKNOWN]: Who?
[UNKNOWN]: Who don't say Mike Lee, Mike Lee can't get the votes?
[UNKNOWN]: So the our House of Lords operates by its own rules.
[UNKNOWN]: And he got a fight within those rules, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So no, Thune is the Senate majority leader.
[UNKNOWN]: He's there because he was the senior senator.
[UNKNOWN]: Rick Scott was a no but Scott didn't have the votes.
[UNKNOWN]: And there's nothing to say would have the votes after this.
[UNKNOWN]: And there are plenty of senators to say, well, I don't mind working under
[UNKNOWN]: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer I wouldn't mind I'm not going to be bully but again this is politics it's all about who's got leverage in the like so Mike Lee would be wonderful but I don't know it he couldn't replace him because he just doesn't have the votes That's his own probably he's got to work that out now and the ogle that was an interesting one that I came out of Left field or right field whatever your persuasion is there
[UNKNOWN]: We dropped the ball on that, I think, again, that's an RNC thing and it's a it's a deep red district, so we don't have to worry about it, but Olga's great, but he, he was a little scandal plague.
[UNKNOWN]: with some financial mishandling accusations, not proved or anything to my knowledge.
[UNKNOWN]: But that scandals was there and it did damage him in the eyes of his constituents.
[UNKNOWN]: Also his district got re-drawn.
[UNKNOWN]: and an included much more farmer, farm, dense regions that his opponent comes from.
[UNKNOWN]: So his opponent already had all those political connections with them.
[UNKNOWN]: And so he was already a bit damaged.
[UNKNOWN]: And then there wasn't fairness.
[UNKNOWN]: There was a pack led by a Democrat that poured all this money to try to get rid of stupid.
[UNKNOWN]: It was a waste of money.
[UNKNOWN]: It's not like the seat is gonna go blue.
[UNKNOWN]: But they just wanted to replace him.
[UNKNOWN]: But they replaced him with someone, I forget his name, but he's thoroughly maga.
[UNKNOWN]: Nobody's questioning the maga.
[UNKNOWN]: agenda.
[UNKNOWN]: So this was sort of an in-house debate as it were.
[UNKNOWN]: And yeah, Andy Oberloss on unfortunately he's a good guy, but he'll just be replaced with another maga guy.
[UNKNOWN]: Follow me, is any word on a collab with Promethi and update?
[UNKNOWN]: No, I have a foot, thank you guys.
[UNKNOWN]: I just haven't followed up yet on that.
[UNKNOWN]: Josh, I don't know if you want to make a note to see if to meet your or somebody can reach out to them.
[UNKNOWN]: D.J.
[UNKNOWN]: L. S. B. Vapes.
[UNKNOWN]: It's discussing this communist takeover.
[UNKNOWN]: I came here from Europe while ago and I feel like it's deja vu of what I ran away from, deport these traders.
[UNKNOWN]: You're not alone, DJ.
[UNKNOWN]: You're not alone at all.
[UNKNOWN]: I have a good friend from Russia, grew up in, uh,
[UNKNOWN]: in Moscow.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's exactly what he says.
[UNKNOWN]: He said, I just listen to them talk and it's the same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, that's the difference between socialism and communism.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, I ain't a fan of socialism.
[UNKNOWN]: But the difference is socialism is really an economic system.
[UNKNOWN]: Communism is an ideology.
[UNKNOWN]: Communism is the declery.
[UNKNOWN]: The communism is the notion that the world has made
[UNKNOWN]: of an enemy and a friend of a dictator, actually even said because politics is technically that Carl Schmidt taught us that.
[UNKNOWN]: But it's made up of an oppressor and oppressed, a victimizer and a victim.
[UNKNOWN]: That's why they're always the victim.
[UNKNOWN]: Always, that's right, they always play out with.
[UNKNOWN]: And so he said, what do you think they did in communism and in the Soviet Union?
[UNKNOWN]: It's exactly how they did it.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, again, it was formed more in terms of materialist means
[UNKNOWN]: socialism, but, um, and again, man, Donnie will do that, right?
[UNKNOWN]: The warmth of collected of what a, what a clown.
[UNKNOWN]: Um, but he's here in the same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: Yep.
[UNKNOWN]: Say, say, he said, it's, this is act too.
[UNKNOWN]: And, uh, he said he, you know, now, but now he's a gun-totin, you know, Patriot.
[UNKNOWN]: So he has, he has no intention of, uh, falling victim to that.
[UNKNOWN]: Robert Driscold, Dr. Steve, could the Clarity Act piggyback for a vote behind the save act?
[UNKNOWN]: Yes, I think so.
[UNKNOWN]: Is that the Clarity Act?
[UNKNOWN]: Is that the crypto?
[UNKNOWN]: Let me see, hold on a second.
[UNKNOWN]: Just remind my third plan.
[UNKNOWN]: Just do, do, do.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but I'm assuming it could if it's it's finding its own problems as it were.
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, what's going on?
[UNKNOWN]: Oh, okay.
[UNKNOWN]: It's looking at my art is going slow today.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, digital asset market clarity act.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, most comprehensive US crypto regulation ever to advance.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I think so.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, it'd be interesting to see what Democrats would be opposed to it.
[UNKNOWN]: I would, I would, I'd be surprised if that, I mean, outside of Elizabeth Warren and so forth.
[UNKNOWN]: I'd be surprised if that didn't clear the filibuster.
[UNKNOWN]: But we'll have to see.
[UNKNOWN]: But again, the same thing.
[UNKNOWN]: It does.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, especially with a US Bitcoin reserve, I could see it passing as a reconciliation as it does deal with some kind of budgetary issue in that sense.
[UNKNOWN]: So, there'd be interesting to see.
[UNKNOWN]: Ken, the Dems are splitting.
[UNKNOWN]: How do you see this playing out and over what time span?
[UNKNOWN]: Does one side form a third party?
[UNKNOWN]: This is nearly impossible.
[UNKNOWN]: And you know how to say, no, I agree with you.
[UNKNOWN]: That's why I mean, apparently is Tucker talking about forming a third party.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, good, you know, good luck.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, if the richest man on the planet can do it, good luck, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So, yes, but they are splitting.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, this is,
[UNKNOWN]: Keep in mind, this is James Carvel, who's been talking a lot about this late list.
[UNKNOWN]: James Carvel's sounding the alarm to donors to starve the Democrat party until they get rid of these DSA guys.
[UNKNOWN]: He's sounding the alarm to the media, stop platforming these guys with these puff interviews, making you think, making everyone think they're just cute little socialist and nothing more.
[UNKNOWN]: and socialism is good, you know, stop doing that because you're going to, you're going to kill this party.
[UNKNOWN]: So it is, it's sort of a clarion called disguised as, well, yep, that's what's going to happen if these guys take over.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm out of here.
[UNKNOWN]: So it's a warning that they're, they're supposed to take seriously now, so it's to push these guys out of the party.
[UNKNOWN]: I think it's too late.
[UNKNOWN]: I think they're they're taking over.
[UNKNOWN]: They're they're the mega version of the Democrat party, mega being the people taking power back from a corrupt elite in their party and restoring restoring national sovereignty, economic sovereignty, and cultural sovereignty.
[UNKNOWN]: These are leftist populists, leftist citizens, taking power away from their corrupt establishment elite.
[UNKNOWN]: But they want to restore wokeness.
[UNKNOWN]: They want to restore radical socialism and progressivism and third worldism.
[UNKNOWN]: I wouldn't even say restore.
[UNKNOWN]: They want to impose wokeness.
[UNKNOWN]: So, maga movement is a restoration movement.
[UNKNOWN]: It's make America great again.
[UNKNOWN]: whereas DSA is a revolution movement that's about wiping out what made America great and replacing it with a third world version country in their own image.
[UNKNOWN]: So I see them splitting at some point.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't think they will come over to the Republican Party.
[UNKNOWN]: I think JD is already shown that
[UNKNOWN]: the interview we had we built more to me is very comparable to the relationship that Trump had with RFK Jr.
[UNKNOWN]: I think there is something there where okay what do you want Bill what are you looking for I just you know look I want rule of law I want free speech I want you to stay the hell out of my bedroom and my life and so
[UNKNOWN]: Bill, you got it.
[UNKNOWN]: You got it.
[UNKNOWN]: And California, we're not going to touch it.
[UNKNOWN]: You did a bit, but you do want an election, take it off course I do.
[UNKNOWN]: Okay, we're going to take care of that.
[UNKNOWN]: You do want those board of security, of course, to do.
[UNKNOWN]: Okay, we're going to take care of that.
[UNKNOWN]: So I think JD is going to be a very transformational figure in this transition of this, what's left about this, you know, 40% of Democrats who just don't want anything to do with this DSA freak show.
[UNKNOWN]: to eight to eight, oh, Zbear I guess any better Sarah Palin will turn her back on Trump.
[UNKNOWN]: It's irrelevant Sarah Palin just doesn't have any political cloud anymore.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know, but there's it's just irrelevant.
[UNKNOWN]: She doesn't have any political cloud.
[UNKNOWN]: And to my, our education system has been purged basic history of Western civilization, leaving it vulnerable to redefinition, you're absolutely right.
[UNKNOWN]: You're absolutely right.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's why we're such passionate advocates here of classical education, of returning to the education of the medievalists actually going all the way back to Plato on the 4th century BC in Athens.
[UNKNOWN]: and where students learn history, art, architecture, music, poetry, great literature, great books, and all made coherent through restoring theology is the queen of the sciences, and teaching them Latin, teaching them Greek, all that good stuff.
[UNKNOWN]: That's changing the world as we speak.
[UNKNOWN]: So yet, but the public school system is just basically a socialist factory at this point.
[UNKNOWN]: MDE moral question.
[UNKNOWN]: Why do we outlaw segregation seems after civil rights?
[UNKNOWN]: We heard the black community in over time gave the government a political race weapon.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, it's interesting.
[UNKNOWN]: No, I moral.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, I mean, the answer to it to it morally simply put is because we are a Christian society.
[UNKNOWN]: We see the human person defined by virtue of their relationship to something that is itself not human.
[UNKNOWN]: And it cannot be found in any human quality.
[UNKNOWN]: So, to be human is to be created in the image of God.
[UNKNOWN]: And if you are human,
[UNKNOWN]: our laws then require that we that we all be treated equally under a law that ultimately finds its source in divine revelation.
[UNKNOWN]: So all the founding fathers were natural law theorists.
[UNKNOWN]: And so it meaning meaning that
[UNKNOWN]: Law isn't made up.
[UNKNOWN]: Law is eternal.
[UNKNOWN]: Law comes from God.
[UNKNOWN]: And then we create our own instantiated, culturally specific, nationally specific laws that are supposed to be sort of microcosmic reflections of the divine law.
[UNKNOWN]: And then the argument was that we work that out
[UNKNOWN]: through time reflecting on how we're being consistent with that divine law.
[UNKNOWN]: And it was thought that segregation was inconsistent.
[UNKNOWN]: with the idea of one law for all citizens created in the image of God.
[UNKNOWN]: Just basically that simple.
[UNKNOWN]: Now, you're talking about with civil rights.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know where hurt the black community and then gave the government a political race weapon.
[UNKNOWN]: Yes, I will say that,
[UNKNOWN]: That I don't know what do you mean by hurting the black me unless you're talking about the way we saw blacks.
[UNKNOWN]: congregate in cities and urban areas through and through social policy promises, but a lot of the argument there, I know, to nest diseases, that actually, that actually begins really with FDR.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's, you know, it's, it's post-segregation, but not really into the 60s, that does that come into full fruition.
[UNKNOWN]: So, but prior to that FDR was the one that kind of turned blacks from being pretty staunch Republicans because of Abraham Lincoln into staunch Democrats because they were getting some free goodies as a way.
[UNKNOWN]: That's his argument.
[UNKNOWN]: And nothing it seems to me is hurt the black community more or any community for that matter, even the whites that are on it, then the welfare state.
[UNKNOWN]: If you get locked into
[UNKNOWN]: an underclass culture, it's just a disaster, it's just terrible, and that's not human flourishing.
[UNKNOWN]: But in terms of it being turned into a political weapon, sure, that's for sure, but that's the Democrat.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, again, you could take anything good and turn it into a weapon, the the tree of life or the tree of knowledge are good and evil, right?
[UNKNOWN]: The serpent turned that into a weapon.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, anything good could be turned into a weapon.
[UNKNOWN]: So there's nothing, I mean, really Christianity and I can be turned into a weapon, right?
[UNKNOWN]: So you have, have you, how many, how many of the pastors that you've all met been choir boys there, right now me?
[UNKNOWN]: So, so, moral question, that's why, because what separates us is not race, what separates us is human versus non-human.
[UNKNOWN]: And now this doesn't mean that ethnicity and race and so forth aren't a factor in terms of who should make up the nation as it were.
[UNKNOWN]: So if you want to have an immigration policy that favors say Northern Europeans, you know, that's a more power to you.
[UNKNOWN]: There's nothing that says you don't get to select which cultures from the world you want to bring in.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm just saying from a moral perspective, I can't see anything from there, but in terms of who's already here, we're all made in the image of God, and laws apply to all equally, and therefore they're cannot be segregated or discrimination on that basis.
[UNKNOWN]: And the Supreme Court's been pretty consistent with that.
[UNKNOWN]: But yeah, it's been co-opted into this third worldest, Marxist binary, oppressive verses of press.
[UNKNOWN]: It's also known as grievance politics.
[UNKNOWN]: But the good news, you know, is even what's his name?
[UNKNOWN]: Mick Warder.
[UNKNOWN]: He often, he's on, oh, forgetting his name.
[UNKNOWN]: Larry, Gary, Larry's a professor of Brown University.
[UNKNOWN]: I forget, it's just my brain not working.
[UNKNOWN]: But he, a black scholar, he's said openly,
[UNKNOWN]: You know, black grievance politics is dead today.
[UNKNOWN]: It's gone.
[UNKNOWN]: It it appeals to the least amount of people.
[UNKNOWN]: It's ever appeal to not only appeals to a very, very tiny amount.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, look at, you know, I'll sharpen and I'll sharpen on MSNBC.
[UNKNOWN]: What do you think his audiences is lucky if he is lucky 40,000 people are turning in.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm assuming I don't know, but it's got a tiny little audience and nobody cares about it anymore.
[UNKNOWN]: So.
[UNKNOWN]: Taco, woman's, I can't say, woman's and the ravage, or Democrat socialism, implies that you vote for socialism instead of having a gun up to your head, yeah, that's true, that's true.
[UNKNOWN]: While you vote for it and then try, what's the old saying, you can always vote your way into socialism, good luck voting your way out, right?
[UNKNOWN]: live free in USA.
[UNKNOWN]: I'd Dr. Steve.
[UNKNOWN]: Have you seen while in the streets, 1968?
[UNKNOWN]: If not, it's a much watch.
[UNKNOWN]: There's an eerily similar narrative.
[UNKNOWN]: Talk about life imitating aren't.
[UNKNOWN]: I will write that down wild in the streets.
[UNKNOWN]: I will look it up.
[UNKNOWN]: Sounds cool.
[UNKNOWN]: And Remington, DSA is longification of the U.S. are symptoms, not the primary driver.
[UNKNOWN]: We have to look at the city of London, globalists pushing all of this.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, yeah, definitely globalism is there.
[UNKNOWN]: And the irony is that the third worldism that ties DSA and Islamification together,
[UNKNOWN]: will do everything they can to overthrow the globalists, wherever they are, London, Brussels, DC, Davos, they'll overthrow them.
[UNKNOWN]: It's technically bio-leninism.
[UNKNOWN]: If you don't check off the right ID boxes, or if you're just not part of the club, they'll get rid of you.
[UNKNOWN]: So, but yes, it is an ideology that is deliberately being pushed on us.
[UNKNOWN]: I wouldn't even say just the Londoners is it where I would say as well, because I'm not as, I'm not as up on that, I say the Permitian ladies, but certainly Beijing, Moscow, they're pushing stuff like that in our social media feeds, pushing third-worldism that they can see definitely
[UNKNOWN]: T, uh, page, I guess we, uh, the required senator to have a challenge to tune, we really need seven more totally to vote them out.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but good, yeah, good luck getting the seven.
[UNKNOWN]: I area.
[UNKNOWN]: Good luck.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm not, I'm not trying to be a, uh, wet blanket here.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm just, again, I'm a realist.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't, I just don't see it.
[UNKNOWN]: It is an inherently dysfunctional institution right now.
[UNKNOWN]: Remember,
[UNKNOWN]: bonafide budget or bill, I should say, law bill that changes the laws of the country beyond reconciliation.
[UNKNOWN]: They have not passed a genuine law bill that was able to get over the 60 vote
[UNKNOWN]: It's been it's been over a decade since they have seen a major bill that changes the laws of the land passed in the Senate we are in a legislative paralysis right now and that's why Trump's like kill the filibuster and what will break the paralysis it's not a problem.
[UNKNOWN]: Lennox Man, it seems that the current political landscape in the United States is no longer supported by two parties do you think the formation of third political parties possible in the United States if not why not yet no because the two parties the two parties also so keep in my so.
[UNKNOWN]: The, as I understand, the framers could have done a parliamentary-like system like they do in Europe.
[UNKNOWN]: They've found that radically unstable.
[UNKNOWN]: And keep in mind, European governments are often run by what are called technological governments or technocratic governments.
[UNKNOWN]: So, so that's when no, you have a bunch of parties, nobody gets an outright majority.
[UNKNOWN]: And so they have to form coalitions with one another.
[UNKNOWN]: But then though, as you can see, those coalitions break and they fall apart.
[UNKNOWN]: and, you know, they go, they go full, you know, they just take their ball and run home.
[UNKNOWN]: And so, rather than having an election every other month, they bring in a technocratic government, these are people that are technically not of any party.
[UNKNOWN]: They're just professional administrators who take over the government.
[UNKNOWN]: And again, I'm not that the founding fathers were thinking this way, but they realized, I think, that having multiple multiple parties is problematic.
[UNKNOWN]: So it morphed into more or less two parties so that one will have a majority, all right.
[UNKNOWN]: You're going to have a majority in the house.
[UNKNOWN]: You're going to have a majority in the Senate if you can't and a majority and you'll win the Presidency.
[UNKNOWN]: Somebody's going to win the Presidents.
[UNKNOWN]: So you can have split government with a
[UNKNOWN]: One president, one party, a house of another party, senate of the president's party.
[UNKNOWN]: You could do all kinds of things, but somebody's going to in the end be in charge.
[UNKNOWN]: And for lack of better sense.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, that's, that's the way I think that's a pretty good way of doing it.
[UNKNOWN]: If you don't like it, take over the party like magnitude, take over the or like the DSA is doing.
[UNKNOWN]: So what happened is mega got taken over.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, on one side, MAGA got taken over.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, Republicans got taken over by MAGA, but now it seems you've got some influencers who don't like what MAGA has become.
[UNKNOWN]: So now they're splitting off and trying to form their own party.
[UNKNOWN]: Good luck with that.
[UNKNOWN]: Even again, the richest man on the planet couldn't do that.
[UNKNOWN]: And the reason is is because the two parties have made it legally, nearly impossible to run as a third party person.
[UNKNOWN]: Yes, you'll see, like we just saw in Michigan, yes, you'll see, you know, green party on there here or there or the constitution part of it, but they're just, they're nothing, they're barely getting 0.1.2.3% of the vote.
[UNKNOWN]: They just don't have the resources, they don't have the donors,
[UNKNOWN]: They don't have anywhere near the network institutional power to pull it off.
[UNKNOWN]: So I don't think so.
[UNKNOWN]: Take over the take over a party.
[UNKNOWN]: That's what you got to do.
[UNKNOWN]: Father, well, Texas has more registered Democrats and Republicans.
[UNKNOWN]: Is that gap closing like in Pennsylvania?
[UNKNOWN]: I, I may be wrong, but I thought Texas doesn't register according to party.
[UNKNOWN]: So let me see that, that I think Texas is one of them.
[UNKNOWN]: Let me check there, but anyway, either way, I'm sure it's closing just because of how red they are.
[UNKNOWN]: I would be surprised if Democrats still outnumber Republicans to be honest with you in Texas at this point.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, it doesn't register voters by party affiliation, so we wouldn't know.
[UNKNOWN]: But you're winning, I mean, Trump won Texas by 14 points, so obviously there's more Republicans in Democrats.
[UNKNOWN]: But that gap is happening, that and cap is closing in Pennsylvania.
[UNKNOWN]: Memoraming to love your brother, can please take a second to explain why giving aid and comfort to the CCP does not attract a charge of treason or sedition.
[UNKNOWN]: I generally don't understand.
[UNKNOWN]: I don't know, I don't know if I can answer that question, be honest with you.
[UNKNOWN]: You know, again, I guess they could say freedom, freedom of speech.
[UNKNOWN]: Well, you can't do that as an elected official unless you're a swallel.
[UNKNOWN]: So I don't know, I don't know quite the answer.
[UNKNOWN]: Again, I just think, you know, we do have what's the communist act of the 1950s.
[UNKNOWN]: But it's never been enforced and most legal scholars laugh it out of their classrooms in terms of its constitutionality.
[UNKNOWN]: But I'm with you.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, I just think,
[UNKNOWN]: There's, you know, you got to draw the line of what's accepted in terms of foreign alliances, such as that's for sure.
[UNKNOWN]: Christopher C, if we keep the Senate in the house, what would you like to see Trump push for?
[UNKNOWN]: I'd like more public biblical education pro-life policies and stronger budget cuts.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I mean, that's, well, Trump is not going to push pro-life policies.
[UNKNOWN]: No, I mean, I'll do pro-like policies at a federal level, but he's not going to get involved with New York or California or anything like that.
[UNKNOWN]: Because, I mean, really, the overturning of Roe v. Wade settled it.
[UNKNOWN]: This is not a federal issue, this is a state issue, and has to be resolved with the consent of the government.
[UNKNOWN]: I like the, I like the more public biblical education.
[UNKNOWN]: I'm certainly school choice.
[UNKNOWN]: He, in his first administration, he really was interested in pushing universal school choice.
[UNKNOWN]: I'd love to see something like that because that won't me help.
[UNKNOWN]: education, stronger budget cards, and we'll see.
[UNKNOWN]: Yeah, he's trying that.
[UNKNOWN]: I mean, he's doing it more through regulations.
[UNKNOWN]: So for everyone regulation, you pass, you have to you have to scrap 10 things like that.
[UNKNOWN]: My thing for me is I think he's got to clean up our universities.
[UNKNOWN]: He's got to do that.
[UNKNOWN]: Our universities are literally sleeper cells and the radicalism
[UNKNOWN]: that's made its way into the University of Cultural Marxist Radicalism has to be expunged.
[UNKNOWN]: These are not professors.
[UNKNOWN]: These are ideologues, and they're doing everything they can to brainwash these students into becoming communists.
[UNKNOWN]: And that's it.
[UNKNOWN]: All right, guys, have a wonderful weekend as always.
[UNKNOWN]: Like I did last week.
[UNKNOWN]: Keep abreast of this channel because if there's some breaking news and analysis, I will be your back porch professor on Saturday morning until then, guys, have a wonderful weekend.
[UNKNOWN]: Love you.
[UNKNOWN]: God bless.
[UNKNOWN]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
[UNKNOWN]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
[UNKNOWN]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
[UNKNOWN]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.